Physics, Mathematics And Philosophy A Menage A Trois

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Formerly of International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna ,AT

Keywords:

No Keywords

Abstract

Manage k Trois, however interesting and exciting it may seem, has serious drawbacks. It is rarely successful or satisfactory to all concerned. The three disciplines : physics, mathematics and philosophy — all including or based on logic — have their separate jurisdictions, aims and methods. While the first two are generally unequivocal and to a great extent uncontroversial in their utterances, philosophers may differ greatly among themselves when discussing the same subject, for instance, about the existence of physical and matheniatical entities (ontology) or the manner in which we come to know about the external world (epistemology), with nobody being proved right or wrong in the end. Not with standing this well known feature about the three enterprises, and the fact that cross-fertilization of ideas from different disciplines can be very fruitful, we should guard against pitfalls when treading border areas. A few examples of such pitfalls and resulting confusion are discussed in this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1996-03-08

How to Cite

Sanatani, S. (1996). Physics, Mathematics And Philosophy A Menage A Trois. Indian Science Cruiser, 10(1), 15–25. Retrieved from http://informaticsjournals.com/index.php/ISC/article/view/42666

Issue

Section

Articles

 

References

R Courant and H Robbins, What is Mathematics? Oxford University Press, 1941.

Mario Bunge, A Skeptic's Beliefs and Disbeliefs, New Ideas in Psychology, 9, J3J, J59J.

R B Lindsay, The Nature of Physics, Brown University Press, Providence, USA 1968.

Mario Bunge, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Volume 7, Chapter 2, Kluwer Publishers, Dordrecht, 1985.

G H Hardy, A Mathematician's Apology, Cambridge University Press, 1940, 1967

Hao Wang, Imagined Discussions with Godel and with Wittgenstaein, 2nd Kurt Gbdel Colloquium, Kirchberg, 1991.

P F Strawson, Analysis and Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, 1992.

G P Baker and P M S Hacker, Wittgenstein, Meaning and Understanding, Blackwell, 1983

Mario Bunge, The Interpretation of Heisenberg's Inequalities, Benken und Umdenken, Piper Verlag, Munchen, 1977.

R Scruton, Kant, Oxford University Press, 1982.

K Mainzer, Chaos, Fraktale und Philosophic, Information Philosophie, Lorrach, Mai 1992.

D R Hofstadter, Godel, Escher, Bach, Penguin, 1980.

H C Reichel and E P de la Riba (eds), Naturwissenschaft und Weltbild, Verlag Holder, Vienna, 1992.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>