Manufacturing and Assembly of ITER Cryostat - Welding Challenges and Experiences

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat ,IN
  • ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat ,IN
  • ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat ,IN
  • ITER Organization, Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon, St Paul Lez Durance Cedex ,FR
  • ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat ,IN
  • ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat ,IN
  • ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat ,IN
  • ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat ,IN
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited, Heavy Engineering, Hazira Manufacturing Complex, Gujarat ,IN
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited, Heavy Engineering, Hazira Manufacturing Complex, Gujarat ,IN
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited, Heavy Engineering, Hazira Manufacturing Complex, Gujarat ,IN
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited, Heavy Engineering, Hazira Manufacturing Complex, Gujarat ,IN
  • Larsen & Toubro Limited, Heavy Engineering, Hazira Manufacturing Complex, Gujarat ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22486/iwj.v54i4.210111

Keywords:

ITER Cryostat, Dimensional Control, High Thickness, SAW, Hot Wire TIG.

Abstract

The ITER Cryostat-the largest austenitic stainless steel vessel provides ultra-cool environment for the ITER Vacuum vessel and the Superconducting Magnets. It weighs ∼3500 t and measures up to ∼29 meters in diameter and ∼29 meters in height. Material of Construction is dual marked SS 304/304L and thickness varies from 25 mm to 200 mm.

The Design, manufacturing and inspection of the cryostat is as per ASME Section VIII Division 2 with supplementary requirement of ITER. Due to large number of penetrations and transportation limitation at Site calls for the segmentation which results in number of subassemblies. Massive amount of welding deposition is required to join these subassemblies to fabricate the segment.

ITER Specification for Cryostat demands stringent dimensional tolerance requirement (0.3% out of roundness) as compare to ASME. Other challenges are higher thickness weld joints in all position, space constraints, welding accessibility and stringent ITER vacuum requirements. Austenitic Stainless steel is prone to distortion due to low thermal conductivity and high coefficient of thermal expansion. This paper covers improvements done in the traditional welding process SAW, FCAW and to achieve dimension requirements and results are discussed. This paper also covers application NG Hot wire TIG for Site weld joints.

n order to simulate the job conditions, mockup of 40° segment on base section and 60#176; segment for lower cylinder segment was performed for Welding & NDE feasibility, Welding sequence establishment for dimensional achievement. This paper also highlights the Learnings acquired from the mockups and implementation during manufacturing.

Author Biographies

Mitul Patel, ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-8557

Vaibhav Joshi, ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0689-5469

Rajnikant Prajapati, ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7887-9751

Anil K. Bhardwaj, ITER Organization, Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon, St Paul Lez Durance Cedex

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-8257

Girish Gupta, ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9388-990X

Jagrut Bhavsar, ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6736-0586

Mukesh Jindal, ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1868-3191

Amit Palaliya, ITER-India, Institute For Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2994-020X

Jimmy Dutt, Larsen & Toubro Limited, Heavy Engineering, Hazira Manufacturing Complex, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1802-214X

Chirag Patel, Larsen & Toubro Limited, Heavy Engineering, Hazira Manufacturing Complex, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8686-4843

Dipen Shah, Larsen & Toubro Limited, Heavy Engineering, Hazira Manufacturing Complex, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5920-2489

Viren Patel, Larsen & Toubro Limited, Heavy Engineering, Hazira Manufacturing Complex, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1598-0972

S. Sivakumar, Larsen & Toubro Limited, Heavy Engineering, Hazira Manufacturing Complex, Gujarat

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9367-0016

Downloads

Published

2021-10-31

Issue

Section

Award Winning Paper: ESAB India Award 2020-21

 

References

Bhardwaj A (2016); Overview and status of ITER Cryostat manufacturing, Fusion Eng. Des.

ASME, Section VIII Div. 2.

ITER Vacuum Handbook and Its Appedices.

Prajapati R (2016); Validation and implementation of sandwich structure bottom plate torib weld joint in the base section of ITER Cryostat, Fusing Eng. Des., pp. 109-111.

RCC (2007); MR Edition.

ASME Section IX.