Reuse of Brick Waste in the Construction Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2024/35536Keywords:
Brick Aggregate Reuse, Demolition Waste Management, Sustainable ConstructionAbstract
Demolition work produces a lot of waste or demolition waste made up of different materials like concrete, wood, metals, bricks, glass, plastics and asphalt. To maintain environmental sustainability this waste must be managed. This study offers a sustainable solution for the construction industry by providing a thorough analysis of demolition waste management with a focus on the reuse of brick aggregate and brick dust. Samples from a controlled demolition site were collected for the study. The brick samples from the demolition site were found through laboratory testing to have greater compressive strength than regular bricks, making them an acceptable building material. Brick dust was also discovered to be a superior void filler. These waste materials were used to create lean concrete, which was stronger than regular concrete and thus suitable for building. Cost comparisons revealed significant cost savings, making this strategy appealing from an economic standpoint. The study emphasises how using bricks made from demolition debris could lower carbon emissions. Responsible demolition waste management can also prevent priceless land resources from being turned into landfills, enhance soil quality and advance in building a circular economy. In conclusion, improving demolition waste management, particularly by recycling brick waste, offers a long-term solution for the building sector. It contributes to a greener and more sustainable future by minimising environmental impact, conserving resources, lowering construction costs and promoting a circular economy.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2024-01-18
Published 2024-04-22
References
Menegaki M, Damigos D, A review on current situation and challenges of construction and demolition waste management. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 2018; 13:8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cogsc.2018.02.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.02.010
Yeheyis M, Hewage K, Alam MS, Eskicioglu C, Sadiq R. An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: A lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2013; 15:81-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098- 012-0481-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6
Coelho A, De Brito J. Influence of construction and demolition waste management on the environmental impact of buildings. Waste Management. 2012; 32(3):532- 41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.011 PMid:22182407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.011
Huang B, Wang X, Kua H, GengY, Bleischwitz R, Ren J, Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2018; 129(18):36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029
Poon CS, Management and recycling of demolition waste in Hong Kong. Waste Management and Research 1997; 15(6):561-72. https://doi.org/10.1006/wmre.1996.0111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/wmre.1996.0111
Yuan H, Shen L, Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management. Waste Management 2011; 31(4);670-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. wasman.2010.10.030 PMid:21169008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.030
Das JK, Bharali B, A simplified numerical approach to predict bearing capacity of soil for a shallow foundation. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences 2022; 12(1):33- 6. https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2022-0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2022-0005
Hinge G, Das JK, Bharali B. A numerical approach to predict soil bearing potential for isolated footing. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts; 2021. p. EGU21-321. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphereegu21- 321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-321
Bharali B, Rajbanshi B, Yangzom T, Dahal H, Rai M, Sewa B. Promoting sustainable housing with fundamental shift beyond the net-zero and green building, In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts; 2021. p. EGU21-15833. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphereegu21- 15833 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-15833
Peng CL, Scorpio DE, Kibert CJ, Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations. Construction Management and Economics. 1997; 15(1):49-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997373105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997373105
Poon CS, Yu ATW, Ng LH, On-site sorting of construction and demolition waste in Hong Kong. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2001; 32 (2):157- 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00052-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00052-0
Wu Z, Yu ATW, Shen L, Liu G, Quantifying construction and demolition waste: An analytical review. Waste Management. 2014; 34(9):1683-92. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.010 PMid:24970618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.010
Rao A, Jha KN, Misra S, Use of aggregates from recycled construction and demolition waste in concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2007; 50(1):71- 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.05.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.05.010