Assessing the Sustainability of Diverse Biofuels through Life Cycle and Techno-Economic Analysis

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Nisit Kumar Parida
     Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad – 826004, Jharkhand ,IN
  • Kavita Jha
     Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad – 826004, Jharkhand ,IN
  • Ravi Nigam
     Mody University of Science and Technology, Sikar - 332311, Rajasthan ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/45549

Keywords:

Biodiesel, Energy, Fuels, Greenhouse Gas

Abstract

The global shift towards sustainable energy sources has spurred extensive exploration of biofuels as promising substitutes for traditional fossil fuels. Yet, pinpointing the optimal biofuel necessitates a nuanced evaluation across environmental, economic, and technological fronts. This study undertakes a comparative analysis of three prominent biofuels—biodiesel, bioethanol, and biogas—employing a multi-faceted assessment framework integrating both Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Techno-Economic Assessment (TEA). Through a comprehensive examination encompassing environmental impacts, economic viability, and operational efficacy, this research offers insights into the strengths and limitations inherent in each biofuel variant. By shedding light on the sustainability prospects of these biofuels across diverse applications, the findings aim to furnish stakeholders with informed guidance for selecting the most fitting and sustainable biofuel options.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2024-09-05

How to Cite

Parida, N. K., Jha, K., & Nigam, R. (2024). Assessing the Sustainability of Diverse Biofuels through Life Cycle and Techno-Economic Analysis. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 71(12B), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/45549

Issue

Volume 71, Issue 12B , 2023

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

 

References

Demirbas A. Biofuels securing the planet’s future energy needs. Energy Convers Manag. 2009; 50(9):2239-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.05.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.05.010

Kumar A, Sharma S. Potential non-edible oil resources as biodiesel feedstock: An Indian perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011; 15(4):1791-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.020

Guinée JB. Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Springer Sci Bus Media. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978897

Cherubini F, Strømman AH. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 102:437-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.010 PMid:20832298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.010

Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK, Dalai AK. Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010; 14(2):578-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003

Peters, MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE. Plant design and economics for chemical engineers. McGraw-Hill; 2003.

Aro EM. From first generation biofuels to advanced solar biofuels. Ambio. 2015; 45(Suppl 1):24-31. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0730-0 PMid:26667057 PMCid:PMC4678123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0730-0

Borrion AL, McManus MC, Hammond GP. Environmental life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from wheat straw. Biomass Bioenerg. 2012; 47:9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.017

ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization.

Cherubini F, Ulgiati S. Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems-A LCA case study. Appl Energ. 2010; 87(1):47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.08.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.08.024

Muñoz I, Gómez MJ, Fernández-Alba AR. Life cycle assessment of biofuels from feedstock to end use. Renew Energ. 2010; 35(5):2204-212.

Gnansounou E, Dauriat A, Villegas J, Panichelli L. Life cycle assessment of biofuels: Energy and greenhouse gas balances. Bioresour Technol. 2009; 100(21):4919-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.067 PMid:19553106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.067

Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Biological Sciences. 2006; 103(30):11206-10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604600103 PMid:16837571 PMCid:PMC1544066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604600103

Singh A, Smyth BM, Murphy JD. A biofuel strategy for Ireland with an emphasis on production of biomethane and minimization of land-take. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010; 14(1):277-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.004

Timilsina GR, Shrestha A. How much hope should we have for biofuels?. Energy. 2011; 36(4):2055-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.08.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.08.023