Anodic Behaviour of Ti-12 in Various Electrolytes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18311/jsst/2018/16027Keywords:
Anodization, Constant Current Density, Formation Rate, Titanium-12Abstract
Anodization of Ti-12 alloy has been carried out in various electrolytes at different constant current densities and temperatures. Kinetics of anodic films was studied in different electrolytes at different constant current densities ranging from 4mAcm-2 to 64mAcm-2 and at different temperatures ranging from 298 to 338K. From the plots of formation voltage (V) vs time (t), rates of formation were calculated. The rate of film formation and breakdown voltage increase with increase in constant current density while decrease with increase in temperature. The kinetics were found better in sulphamic acid electrolyte at room temperature compared to other electrolytes at the same anodizing conditions.Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2018-07-26
Published 2019-01-03
References
D. M. Brunette, P. Tengavall, M. Textor and P. Thomsen, Springer, 171 (2001).
H. Luckey, and F. Kubli, ASTM, 796 (1981).
G. R. Parr, L. K. Gardner, and R. W. Toth, J. Posthent. Dent., 54, 410 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/00223913(85)90562-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90562-1
J. E. G. Gonzalez and J. C. Minza-Rosca, J. Electroanal. Chem., 471, 109 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S00220728(99)00260-0
K. S. Brammer, C. J. Frandsen and S. Jin, Trends Biotechnol., 30, 315 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.02.005 PMid:22424819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.02.005
S. L. De-Assis, S. W. Solynec and I. Costa, Electrochim. Acta., 51, 1815 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.121
F. H. Jones, Surf. Sci. Rep., 42, 75 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(00)00011-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(00)00011-X
R. Narayanan, H. J. Lee, J. Y. Kwon and K. H. Kim, Mater. Chem. Phys., 125, 510 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.10.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.10.024
G. K. Mor, O. K. Varghese, M. Paulose, K. Shankar, and C. A. Grimes, Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. Cell., 90, 2011 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2006.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2006.04.007
Z. M. Yan, T. W. Guo, H. B. Pan and J. J. Yu, Mater. Trans., 43, 3142 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.43.3142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.43.3142
M. V. Diamanti, B. Del Curto, C. Passaro and M. P. Pedeferri, Color. Res. Appl., 37, 384 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/ col.20683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/col.20683
M. Kisaichi, Surf. Technol., 40, 66 (1989). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4139/sfj.40.66
B. B. Secley, Metal. Progress, 9, 35 (1982).
R. S. Hyam, and D. Choi, RSC ADV., 3, 7057 (2013). https:// doi.org/10.1039/c3ra40581h DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra40581h
V. Jeevana Jyothi, and Ch. Anjaneyulu, E J. Chem., 6, 880 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/579860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/579860
Ch. Anjaneyulu, Thesis, Osmania University, 1981.
G. Raghunathreddy, A. Lavanya and Ch. Anjaneyulu, Bull. Electrochem., 22, 235 (2006).
P. Baskar Reddy and A. Panasa Reddy, Bull. Electrochem., 19, 481 (2003).
T. Aerts, Th. Dimogerontakis, I. D. Graeve, J. Fransaer and H.Terryn, Surf. Coating. Tech., 201, 7310 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.01.044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.01.044
P. Michal, A. Vagaska, E. Fechova, M. Gombar and D. Kozak, METABK, 55, 403 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2016_09_201662