Optimization Condition for Aluminum Alloy 6066 Anodizing

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Chemistry Department, Damascus University - Faculty of Science ,SY
  • Chemistry Department, Damascus University - Faculty of Science ,SY
  • Chemistry Department, Damascus University - Faculty of Science ,SY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jsst/2018/19839

Keywords:

AA, AA6066, Anodizing, Taguchi Method, ANOVA, DOE, SEM

Abstract

The choice of suitable aluminum alloys for a particular application involves tensile strength, density, softness, formability, operability, welding ability, corrosion resistance, etc. Aluminum alloys are widely used in aircraft because of the high strength to weight ratio. The anodizing process of AA has been applied industrially to improve corrosion resistance. In this research, various factors such as (concentration of the electrolyte, temperature, and voltage) affect thickness and hardness during anodizing of AA6066 in sulphuric acid. Process factors have been modified using the Taguchi method through the Design of Experiments (DOE). The Taguchi method includes an orthogonal array of factors, a Signal-to-Noise ratio (S/N), Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), which were used to determine the optimum condition levels for aluminum alloy 6066 anodizing, and to analyze the effect of these conditions on thickness and hardness. It was found that the most effective factor on thickness and micro-hardness is the concentration of the electrolyte. Optimization test was carried out by Taguchi optimization test and the optimal conditions were determined. Finally, the anodizing was carried out on aluminum sample under the optimal conditions then scanned by SEM. The thickness and micro hardness obtained at the optimal conditions were 25μm, and 640Hv, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2019-01-03

How to Cite

Jalal, H., Saoud, Y., & Karabet, F. (2019). Optimization Condition for Aluminum Alloy 6066 Anodizing. Journal of Surface Science and Technology, 34(3-4), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.18311/jsst/2018/19839
Received 2018-01-28
Accepted 2018-07-16
Published 2019-01-03

 

References

‘ASTM standard terminology relating to electroplating', B37406 (2011)

P. G. Sheasby and R. Pinner. ‘The Surface Treatment and Finishing of Aluminum and Its Alloys', 6th ed, Finishing Publications Ltd. and ASM International (2001) PMid:11587871

J. H. Osborn. ‘Understanding and Specifying Anodizing'. OMW Corporation, (2014).

G. D. Sulka and J. Szeremeta, Electrochim Acta, 55, 4377 (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.12.054

R.T. Hitchcock, Trans. Inst. Met. Finish (1991).

ASM Metals Handbook, ‘Surface Engineering', ASM International Handbook Committee (1994).

Van Horn (ed), Kent R. ‘Aluminum I-properties, physical metallurgy', American Society for Metals, US (1967).

P. V. Mathew, et al. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, 110, 3 (2013).

G. Taguchi and S. Konishi, ‘Taguchi Methods, orthogonal arrays and linear graphs, tools for quality' American Supplier Institute, p. 8 (1987).

D. Fratilia and C. Caizar, Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 640 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.007