Investigation of Laser Welding Processes for Automotive Structural Applications

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Welding Engineering and Laser Processing Centre, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL ,GB
  • Welding Engineering and Laser Processing Centre, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL ,GB
  • Welding Engineering and Laser Processing Centre, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL ,GB
  • TVS Motor Company Ltd, Hosur, Tamilnadu ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22486/iwj.v53i3.202942

Keywords:

Gas Metal Arc Welding, Autogenous Laser Welding, Hybrid Laser Arc Welding, Productivity, Weld Bead Geometry, Gap Bridgeability, Distortion, Mechanical Properties.

Abstract

The motive behind this study was to investigate the autogenous laser welding (ALW), and Hybrid laser arc welding (HLAW) processes in the aspects of productivity and quality for the application in automotive industries. Presently, Gas metal arc welding (GMAW) process is being used for the manufacturing of two-wheeler frame. Low power density of GMAW process limits the depth of penetration and productivity of the process which are the two key concerns in automotive industries. Therefore, GMAW process was compared with advanced laser welding processes in the aspects of productivity, heat input, weld bead geometries and gap bridgeability. Effects of these welding methods on distortion and mechanical properties were also evaluated. The trade-off between productivity and quality were interpreted in each processes. Low carbon steel (S275) of 2 mm, 4 mm and 8 mm thick materials with square butt joint configuration were used for the evaluation. Better weld quality with complete penetration was achieved in autogenous laser welding and hybrid laser arc welding processes with improved productivity by a factor of 8 times compared to GMAW in 2 mm and 4 mm thick materials and in 8 mm thick material, complete penetration with an improvement of productivity by a factor of 3 times was achieved. High power density of ALW and HLAW processes provided complete penetration even at ~70% to 80% less heat input than GMAW process which eventually reduces the fusion zone area by ~ 50% to 70%. Therefore, these processes control the metallurgical damage to the base material. Moreover, high power density of HLAW and ALW processes results in ~75% and ~85% less distortion than GMAW process respectively. HLAW process improved the productivity with considerably less increase in hardness than ALW process. For instance, in 2 mm thick material, productivity was improved by 8 times than GMAW process with 55% and 17% increase in average fusion zone hardness in ALW and HLAW processes respectively. In mechanical strength standpoint, all three welding processes produced weld region stronger than base material. Negligible increase in strain was observed on weld metal in DIC test. Therefore, fracture occurred in the base material during tensile test. Lack of bead reinforcement and poor gap bridgeability were found to be the critical concerns in autogenous laser welding process. However, hybridization of laser and arc resolved these issues. Overall, HLAW process found to be superior to GMAW and ALW processes in the aspect of productivity and quality.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-01

Issue

Section

Research Articles

 

References

Kondaiah T and Pavan Kumar D (2016); Shape and material optimization of a two wheeler front suspension frame for pipe type and rectangular cross sections, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 4(6), pp.41-49.

Moré JL (2011); Comparison between a tubular frame and a beam frame, Masters Thesis, School of Industrial Engineering of Barcelona.

Nguyen TC, Weckman DC and Johnson DA (2007); Predicting onset of high speed gas metal arc weld bead defects using dimensional analysis techniques, Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 12(7), pp.634648.

Sun J, Liu X, Tong Y and Deng D (2014); A comparative study on welding temperature fields, residual stress distributions and deformations induced by laser beam welding and CO2 gas arc welding, Materials and Design, 63, pp.519-530.

Sun Q, Di HS, Li JC, Wu BQ and Misra RDK (2016); A comparative study of the microstructure and properties of 800 MPa microalloyed C-Mn steel welded joints by laser and gas metal arc welding, Materials Science and Engineering, 669, pp.150-158.

Kah P, Suoranta R and Martikainen J (2011); Joining of Sheet Metals Using Different Welding Processes, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference, Mechanika.

Oyyaravelu R, Kuppan P and Arivazhagan N (2017); Comparative study on metallurgical and mechanical properties of laser and laser-arc-hybrid welding of HSLA steel, Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing, Atlanta, USA.

Shi G and Hilton P (2005); A comparison of the gap bridging capability of CO2 laser and hybrid CO2 laser MAG welding on 8mm thickness C-Mn steel plate, Proceedings of the 58th Annual Assembly and International Conference of International Institute of Welding, Prague, Czech Republic.

Zhen S, Duan Z, Sun D, Li Y, Gao D and Li H (2014); Study on microstructures and mechanical properties of laserarc hybrid welded S355J2W+N steel, Optics and Laser Technology, 59, pp.11-18.

Colegrove P, Ikeagu C, Thistlethwaite A, Williams S, Nagy T and Suder W (2009); Welding process impact on residual stress and distortion Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 14(8), pp.717-725.

Ikeagu CR (2011); Evaluating the effect of different welding processes on the distortion of 4mm thick DH36 ship panels, MSc Thesis, Cranfield University.

Joesbury AM (2016); New approaches to composite metal joining, PhD Thesis, Cranfield University.