Relativity of the Child Born through Artificial Insemination from the viewpoint of Jurisprudence and Islamic Law

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department of Jurisprudence and Principles of Islamic Law, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom ,IR
  • Department of Jurisprudence and Principles of Islamic Law, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom ,IR
  • Department of Jurisprudence and Principles of Islamic Law, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom ,IR
  • Medicine, Quran and Hadith Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran ,IR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2019/24280

Keywords:

Artificial Insemination, Benefit, Relativity of the Child
Artificial Insemination

Abstract

Artificial insemination is one of the wonderful phenomena of the modern world. Considering that this discussion has not been specifically discussed in the jurisprudential subjects of the early jurists, it can be the source of various jurisprudential and legal issues. In the beginning, some of the jurists believed in the absolute prohibition of all forms of artificial insemination and some great authorities as sources of imitation considered wife and husband's artificial insemination unlawful. However, with the recognition of this issue by some other sources of imitation and legality of the relativity of the child born by artificial insemination is subject to numerous theoretical disputes that raised new perspectives and led to reconsideration of the religious statements. Therefore, the present paper seeks to investigate, study further jurisprudential and legal sources to clarify the legal provisions related to such persons and while respecting their rights, it would prevent the presence of unidentified and derelict children in the community. Because by careful consideration of children born by artificial insemination and the legitimacy of these children in all forms of inoculation, it is possible to take a major step towards eliminating discrimination and preventing further problems in the Islamic society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2019-12-26

How to Cite

Jabbari, S. R., Abedian Kalkhoran, S. H., Askari, A., & Gooshki, H. S. (2019). Relativity of the Child Born through Artificial Insemination from the viewpoint of Jurisprudence and Islamic Law. Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health, 19(3&4), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2019/24280
Received 2019-10-02
Accepted 2019-10-11
Published 2019-12-26

 

References

Saffai SH. Artificial reproduction with medical assistance and embryo transfer in French and Iranian law. Tehran University Press. 1997.

Imami SH. Civil Rights. J 4, Q 8. Qom: Islamiyah Publication. 1992.

Shaheed S, Zayn al-Din al-Jabali al-Amli, El Razda Al-Beyei Fei Al-Lama'a Al-Dashqiyah. Q5, Q1. Qom, Book Publishing. Ref. 1990.

Mohaghegh D, Mostafa. Jurisprudential study of the rights of the family: Marriage and dissolution of the material. Articles 1034 to 1157 of the Civil Code. Islamic Science Publishing Center. 1986.

Golpayegani MR. Assembly of Al-Masaleh. Publisher Dar al-Qur'an al-Karim. 1993.

Moosavi K, Seyyed R, Tahrir al-Wasileh. Q1; Imam Khomeini Institute of Publishing and Works of Imam Khomeini. 2001.

Katoozian N. Family Law. J 2. Ganj Danesh Publication. 2014.

Saffai E, Seyed H, Asadollah. Family rights. 2nd Jah. Tehran University Press. 2007.

Shahidi M. Legal status of laboratory child. Collection of legal articles. Tehran, Majd Scientific and Cultural Assembly. 2008.

Mughniyeh MJ. Al-Fiqah Ali al-Mizha'b al-Khamseh, Dar al-Hassanin (as), Ali al-Islam. 2005.

Hosseini S, Seyyed A, Manhaj al-Salahin. Dar al-Maqr al-'Arbi. 2004.

Khamenei SA, Ajvaba al-esteftaat. Ch 2. Dar al-Wassilah. 1995.

Khoyi SA, Al-Masale Al-Sharia. Q1. Qom, Madinah Al-Alam. 1996.

Sanei Y. Assembly of the Muslims. Q7. Qom. Meysam Temar. 2003.

Qumi (Sheikh S), Mohammed bin Ali bin Babuyeh. I am La Yehzayar Al-Safiyah. Institute for Public Relations. 1986.

Makaram S, Nasser. New Texts; Imam Ali Bin Abi Talib School Publications. 2006.

Most read articles by the same author(s)