Why Are We Not Prepared For Extreme Natural Events?

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • ,DE

Keywords:

Disaster, Tsunami, Losses, Short Term Gains.

Abstract

In 2005, hurricane Katrina severely damaged New Orleans, which has not completely recovered yet. In 2010, an earthquake destroyed Port Au Prince leaving Haiti in shambles until this date. In 2004, the Indian Ocean tsunami killed thousands even as far as Africa, only to be followed in 2011 by the Tohoku tsunami that triggered one of the worst nuclear disasters in history. Each and every one of these extreme natural events was foreseen or foreseeable, given our knowledge about their nature. That knowledge also tells us that this will happen again and again and our losses will rise. What is keeping us from being prepared?

Before the advent of natural sciences, people believed that these events are an act of god to punish the wicked and humble mankind. In many so-called "developing” regions, this belief still exists and may be a reason for fatalism and lack of preparedness. Not so in the US and Japan, which also have been hit hard and have trouble recovering.

Modern societies over-emphasize short-term economic gains, which is certainly one major reason behind this un-preparedness. But economic principles also have the potential to change this in the future.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-11

How to Cite

Dorka, U. E. (2015). Why Are We Not Prepared For Extreme Natural Events?. DHARANA - Bhavan’s International Journal of Business, 9(1), 22–28. Retrieved from https://informaticsjournals.com/index.php/dbijb/article/view/16091

Issue

Section

Research Articles

 

References

MunichRE: NatCatSERVICE, online data repository concerning natural disasters. Metropolitan Municipality of Istanbul (MMI): Earthquake Master Plan for Istanbul. 2003.

UN: Hyogo Framework for Action, 2005-15. Extract from final report, World Conf. on Disaster Reduction, Hyogo, Japan, 2005.

Mühlhausen, A., Dorka, U. E., Smolka, A., Stupazzini, M.: Seismic risk assessment for masonry buildings based on discriminant analysis of a virtual database. 15 World Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, 2012.

Sucuoglu, H., Yazgan, U., Yakut, A.: A screening procedure for seismic risk assessment in urban building stocks. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 23, No. 2, 441-458, 2007.

Dorka, U. E., Conversano, G. A.: Seismic retrofit of All state Building. Proc. IABSE Symposium, San Francisco, 1995.

Calvi, G. M., Spaziante, V.: Reconstruction between temporary and definitive: the CASE project. Italian National Report Research and Construction, Associazione Italiana Tecnico Economia del Cemento, p. 124, 2010.

Letsch, C.: Istanbul sees history razed in the name of regeneration. www.theguardian.com/world/, March 1, 2012.

ITUE Report by Comert, M., Demir, C., Ates, A.O., Tore, E., Ozeren, O., Moshfeghi, A., Khoshkholghi, S., Orakcal, K., Ilki, A.: Field testing of substandard full scale RC buildings for seismic performance assessment: Quasi-static tests. Istanbul Technical University, 2015.