New Forms of Higher Education

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Paul S. Goodman
     ,US
  • Gerard Beenen
     ,US
  • Rangaraj Ramanujam
     ,US

Keywords:

Traditional Institution, Innovative Institution, Organizational Learning Contract and Learning Outcome.

Abstract

The present study is exploratory in nature. In order to examine the forms of higher education organizations two organizations – a traditional and an innovative institution - have been studied. Data were collected on organizational learning contract and the student recall of learning outcomes. The study has revealed that the innovative institution is dominant than the traditional one although both have positive scores on learning outcomes. The organizational learning contract enables an organization and the client to mutually commit for better inputs and learning. There is, however, a need for self designing system to strengthen basic contract.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-23

How to Cite

Goodman, P. S., Beenen, G., & Ramanujam, R. (2017). New Forms of Higher Education. DHARANA - Bhavan’s International Journal of Business, 5(2), 80–86. Retrieved from https://informaticsjournals.com/index.php/dbijb/article/view/18200

Issue

Volume 5, Issue 2, July-December 2011

Section

International Conference on Educational Leadership - 2009

 

References

Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D. and Klein, S. P. 2006. Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages. Research in Higher Education. 47, 1, 1-32.

Chen, Donahue and Klimoski, 2004. Training Undergraduates to Work in Organizational Teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 1, 27-40.

Duderstadt, J. 2003. The future of the public university in America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Earley, P. C., Peterson, R. S. 2004. Cultural chameleon: Cultural intelligence as a new approach to intercultural training. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 1, 100-116.

Goodman, P. 2001. Technology Enhanced Learning: Opportunities for change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goodman, P. and Beenen, G. 2008. Organizational Learning Contracts in Management Education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 4, In press.

Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 1, 75-91.

Kuh, G. 1995. The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 2, 123-155.

Kuh, G. 1999. How are we doing? Tracking the quality of the undergraduate experience, 1960s to the present. Review of Higher Education, 22, 2, 99-120.

Pfeffer J., and Fong, C.T. 2002. The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 1, 74-95.

Rhodes, F. 2004. Reinventing the university. In Weber, L.& Duderstadt, J. (Eds.) Reinventing the Research University. London, Paris, Geneva: Economica.

Wilson, J. 2001. The development of the studio classroom. In Goodman, P. (Ed.), Technology enhanced learning: Opportunities for change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Zemsky, R., Duderstadt, J. (2004). Reinventing the university: An American perspective. In Weber, L. and Duderstadt, J. (Eds.), Reinventing the Research University. London, Paris, Geneva: Economica.

Zhao, C. M. and Kuh, G. D. 2004. Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 2, 115-138.