Intertextuality as a Comparatist’s Tool

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • R. V. Ram
     Department of English, SASTRA University, Kumbakonam ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15613/hijrh/2016/v3i1/111721

Keywords:

Accidental Intertextuality, Dialectical Pattern, Judaeo-Christian Allegory, The Absurd, Thematology.

Abstract

Comparative Literature as a ‘nation-state paradigm’ is under conceptual pressure in the present day context of Transnationalism. If it should survive as a discipline, there is an imperative need to broaden its conceptual framework and retool the discipline. This paper argues and also demonstrates that Intertextuality, specifically, ‘Accidental Intertextuality,’ can be a good tool for a comparatist.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-01

Issue

Volume 3, Issue 1, June 2016

Section

English Language and Literature

 

References

Audi, R. Ed. 1999. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd Edn. Cambridge: CUP.

Bair, D. Samuel Beckett: A Biography. London: Vintage, 1990. pp. 409, 410, 405.

Ball, J. A., & McConachie, B. Theatre Histories: An Introduction. New York: Routledge, 2010.

Barthes, R. Image – Music – Text. Stephen Heath (transl.), London: Fontana, 1977.

Beckett, S. Waiting for Godot. London: Faber and Faber, 1988.

Beckett, S. Endgame. London: Faber and Faber, 1957.

Bloom, H. A Map of Misreading. New York: OUP, 1975.

Boxall, P. Beckett and Homoeroticism. In Oppenheim, L., (Ed.) Palgrave Advances in Samuel Beckett Studies. London: Palgrave, 2004.

Bryden, M. Samuel Beckett and the Idea of God. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, 1998.

Comhrink. A. The matrix and the Echo: International Remodelling in Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstein are Dead. literator 12 (2), 1991.

Cronin, A. Samuel Beckett The Last Modernist. London: Flamingo, 1997.

Culler, Dwight, Ed. poetry and Criticism of Android. Boston: Houghten Mifflin Company. 1961.

Esslin, M. Absurd Drama. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965. Available: http://www.theatredatabase.com/20th_century/martin_esslin_001.html (Accessed on 18/1/2016)

Findley, T. Not Wanted on the Voyage. Hammondsworth: Penguin, 1985.

Fitzsimmons, J. Romantic and contemporary poetry: readings. CQUniversity e-courses, LITR19049 - Romantic and Contemporary Poetry. 2013. Available: http://moodle.cqu.edu.au

Hall, P. The Guardian. 2003.

Hassell, G. What’s On’ London. 1997.

Hunter, J. Tom Stoppard: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead, Jumpers, Travesties, Arcadia. London: Macmillan, 2000.

â€Intertextualityâ€. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/intertextuality. April 2016.

Jacob Meyer, H. Ever After: A study in Intertextuality. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag, 1998.

Keller, E. Crafting a Masterpiece: the Genre Mosaic of Harry Potter. Harrisonborg: Msc, 2013.

Kierkegaard, S. The Essential Kierkegaard. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.

Knowlson, J. Damned to Fame: The Life of Samuel Beckett. London: Bloomsbury, 1996.

Krishnaswamy, N. India’s Language Philosophy with a focus on Comparative Study. New Delhi: Pearson, 2013. ISBN: 978932510616.

Kristeva, J. Word, Dialogue and Novel. Cited by MJM Alfaro in “Intertextuality: Origins And Development Of The Conceptâ€, 1966. Available: www.jstor.org/stable/41054827

Lal, M. The Encyclopaedia Of Indian Literature (Sasay To Zorgot). Sahitya Akademi, 2006. ISBN 978-81-260-1221-3.

Milton, J. Paradise Lost Book I. Available: http://www.paradiselost.org/8-Search-All.html

Nothoff, A. Apocalypse Now Timothy Findley. Aurora Online, 2002.

“Pramanaâ€. New World Encyclopedia. 2 April 2008. Web. 15 April 2016.

Ram, R.V. “A ‘Postcolonial’ Response to Timothy Findley’s Not Wanted on the Voyageâ€. CIEFL Bulletin (New Series), vol. 16(2), pp. 1-17, 2006. ISSN 0970-8340.

Ram, R.V. “Virtuality as a Motif – a Comparative Studyâ€. HuSS: International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 1(2), pp. 59-63, 2014. ISSN (Print): 2349-4778.

Sion, I. “The Zero Soul: Godot’s Waiting Selves In Dante’s Waiting Roomsâ€. Transverse, vol. 2, pp. 70, 2004.

Spivak, Gayathri Chakravarty. Death of a Discipline. NY: Columbia UP, 2003.P.73.

Wohrle, J. “So many cross-references! Methodological reflections on the problem of intertextual relationships and their significance for redaction critical analysis. Methodological Foundations-Redactional Processes-Historical Insights.†Walter de Gruyter, 2012. Available: http://www.basicknowledge101.com/pdf/literacy/Intertextuality.pdf