In vitro assessment of bacterial endophytes for antagonistic activity against Magnaporthe oryzae and Cochliobolus miyabeanus in rice

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru – 560065, Karnataka ,IN
  • Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru – 560065, Karnataka ,IN
  • Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru – 560065, Karnataka ,IN
  • Division of Genomic Resources, ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru – 560024, Karnataka ,IN
  • Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru – 560065, Karnataka ,IN
  • Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru – 560065, Karnataka ,IN
  • Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, IIT Bhilai, Kutelabhata – 492013, Chhattisgarh ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2023/34946

Keywords:

Biocontrol, dual culture, double petri dish assay, phytopathogens, volatile organic compounds

Abstract

Rice is the global staple food, contributing over half of the world’s agricultural production. Excessive fungicide use in rice farming poses environmental, fungicide resistance, and beneficial microbial disruption concerns, making biocontrol, particularly bacteria, a promising biocontrol agent due to their rapid growth, ease of handling, and robust colonization attributes. Endophytes are endosymbionts residing within host plants, playing a pivotal role in plant health without inciting any pathogenic effects. In this study, we investigated the antagonistic potential of four characterized bacterial endophytic strains, viz., Bacillus velezensis strains A6 and P42, B. pseudomycoides HP3d and Paenibacillus polymyxa PGSS-1 against major foliar rice pathogens viz., Magnaporthe oryzae and Cochliobolus miyabeanus. Against M. oryzae, all the endophytic strains exhibited significant per cent inhibition (50.00-66.67%) and the highest inhibition of 66.67% was achieved by B. pseudomycoides strain HP3d, while the lowest inhibition of 50 and 51.11% was by B. velezensis strain A6, P42, and P. polymyxa PGSS1, respectively. These endophytes outperformed the positive control, P. fluorescens which showed 44.44% inhibition. Similarly, against C. miyabeanus, 31.25-43.75% inhibition was recorded, of which B. velezensis strain A6 exhibited the highest inhibition (43.75%), while B. velezensis strain P42 showed the lowest (31.25%). Furthermore, a double Petri dish assay was conducted to evaluate the volatile compounds produced by these endophytes against the two rice pathogens. It was observed that the volatile compounds produced by B. pseudomycoides strain HP3d and P. polymyxa strain PGSS1 significantly and effectively inhibited the growth of M. oryzae by 88.89% when compared to P. fluorescens (50.00%), whereas B. velezensis strain A6 showed the lowest inhibition (33.33%). Against the brown spot pathogen, C. miyabeanus, the endophytes demonstrated inhibition ranging from 56.25-87.50%, with B. pseudomycoides strain HP3d and P. fluorescens achieving the highest inhibition (87.50%) and B. velezensis strain P42 showing the lowest (56.25%). These results highlight the significant and varied inhibitory effects of volatile compounds released by these endophytes against fungal pathogens of rice. Overall, our findings highlight the promising biocontrol potential of these endophytic strains under in vitro conditions with B. pseudomycoides strain HP3d and P. polymyxa PGSS1 showing exceptional efficacy and they can be deployed in the field for the management of foliar fungal pathogens in rice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

PARTH GULATI, Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, IIT Bhilai, Kutelabhata – 492013, Chhattisgarh

 

 

Downloads

Published

2023-10-10

How to Cite

KUKRETI, A., CHETHANA, B. S., PRASANNAKUMAR, M. K., MANJUNATHA, C., KARUNAKAR REDDY, N., PUNEETH, M. E., & GULATI, P. (2023). <i>In vitro</i> assessment of bacterial endophytes for antagonistic activity against <i>Magnaporthe oryzae</i> and <i>Cochliobolus miyabeanus</i> in rice. Journal of Biological Control, 37(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2023/34946

Issue

Section

Research Articles
Received 2023-09-04
Accepted 2023-09-27
Published 2023-10-10

 

References

Amruta, N., Kumar, M. P., Puneeth, M. E., Sarika, G., Kandikattu, H. K., Vishwanath, K., and Narayanaswamy, S. 2018. Exploring the potentiality of novel rhizospheric bacterial strains against the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Pathol J, 34(2): 126. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.11.2017.0242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.11.2017.0242

Childs, N., and LeBeau, B. 2022. Rice Outlook: August 2022. Amber Waves: The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America.

Chithrashree, Udayashankar, A. C., Nayaka, S. C., Reddy, M. S., and Srinivas, C. 2011. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria mediate induced systemic resistance in rice against bacterial leaf blight caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Biol Control, 59(2): 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.06.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.06.010

El-Deeb, B., Fayez, K., and Gherbawy, Y. 2013. Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from Plectranthus tenuiflorus medicinal plant in Saudi Arabia desert and their antimicrobial activities. J Plant Interact, 8(1): 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2012.680077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2012.680077

Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., and van Elsas, J. D. 2008. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol, 16(10): 463-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.008

Karim, H., Hamka, L., Kurnia, N., and Junda, M. 2018. Effectivity of antagonistic bacteria in controlling of Fusarium wilt diseases of banana (Musa paradisiaca) by in vitro. J Phys, 1028: Article 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012014

Kato, H. 2001. Rice blast disease. Pestic Outlook, 12(1): 23-25. https://doi.org/10.1039/b100803j DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/b100803j

Kim, S. Y., Song, H., Sang, M. K., Weon, H. Y., and Song, J. 2017. The complete genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis strain GH1-13 reveals agriculturally beneficial properties and a unique plasmid. J Biotechnol, 259: 221- 227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.06.1206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.06.1206

Malfanova, N., Kamilova, F., Validov, S., Shcherbakov, A., Chebotar, V., Tikhonovich, I., and Lugtenberg, B. 2011. Characterization of Bacillus subtilis HC8, a novel plant‐beneficial endophytic strain from giant hogweed. Microb Biotechnol, 4(4): 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00253.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00253.x

Mew, T. W., Leung, H., Savary, S., Vera Cruz, C. M., and Leach, J. E. 2004. Looking ahead in rice disease research and management. Crit Rev Plant Sci, 23(2): 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490433231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490433231

Prasanna, S., Prasannakumar, M. K., Mahesh, H. B., Babu, G. V., Kirnaymayee, P., Puneeth, M. E., Narayan, K. S., and Pramesh, D. 2021. Diversity and biopotential of Bacillus velezensis strains A6 and P42 against rice blast and bacterial blight of pomegranate. Arch Microbiol, 203(7): 4189-4199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02400-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02400-9

Ruiz-Garcia, C., Bejar, V., Martinez-Checa, F., Llamas, I., and Quesada, E. 2005. Bacillus velezensis sp. nov., a surfactant-producing bacterium isolated from the river Vélez in Málaga, southern Spain. Int J Syst Evol, 55(1): 191-195. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63310-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63310-0

Ruqiya, S., Girisha, H., Manjunatha, C., Rangeshwaran, R., Kandan, A., Sivakumar, G., Kumar, M. K. P., Pramesh, D., Shivakumara, K., Venu, H., and Nanditha, S. 2022. Biocontrol potential and molecular characterization of lipopeptides producing Bacillus subtilis against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Biol Control, 36(4): 215-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2022/33785

Rouissi, W., Ugolin, L., Martini, C., Lazzeri, L., and Mari, M. 2013. Control of postharvest fungal pathogens by antifungal compounds from Penicillium expansum. J Food Prot, 76(11): 1879-1886. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-072

Samal, S., and Parida, S. 2021. Major fungal diseases of rice: A case study. Asian J Biol Sci, 10(2):469. https://doi.org/10.5530/ajbls.2021.10.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/ajbls.2021.10.62

Slaton, N. A., Cartwright, R. D., Meng, J., Gbur, E. E., and Norman, R. J. 2003. Sheath blight severity and rice yield as affected by nitrogen fertilizer rate, application method, and fungicide. J Agron, 95(6): 1489-1496. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.1489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.1489

Timmusk, S., Grantcharova, N., and Wagner, E. G. H. 2005. Paenibacillus polymyxa invades plant roots and forms biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol, 71(11): 7292-7300. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.7292-7300.2005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.7292-7300.2005

Vincent, J. M. 1947. The esters of 4‐hydroxybenzoic acid and related compounds. Part I. Methods for the study of their fungistatic properties. J Chem Soc, 66(5): 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5000660504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5000660504

Wang, X., Li, Q., Sui, J., Zhang, J., Liu, Z., Du, J., Xu, R., Zhou, Y., and Liu, X. 2019. Isolation and characterization of antagonistic bacteria Paenibacillus jamilae HS-26 and their effects on plant growth. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3638926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3638926

Yanti, Y., Warnita, W., Reflin, R., and Nasution, C. R., 2018. Characterizations of endophytic Bacillus strains from tomato roots as growth promoter and biocontrol of Ralstonia solanacearum. Biodiversitas, 19(3): 906-911. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190320

Most read articles by the same author(s)