Role of Bioagents and Organic Amendments in the Management of Chickpea Wilt under Field Condition

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Zonal Research Station, Birsa Agricultural University, Darisai, Via- Mahulia, P.O. Barakhurshi, East Singhbhum 832304, Jharkhand ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2009/3653

Keywords:

Chickpea, Cost-Benefit Ratio, Management, Neem Oil Cake, Pongamia glabra Oil Cake, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Trichoderma viride, Wilt and Yield Losses.

Abstract

Pooled analysis of data on wilt incidence in 3 years (2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006- 07) showed that the minimum wilt incidence of 15.6 % was recused in plots with seed priming with T. viride @ 4g kg-1 seed plus soil application of neem oil cake @ 250kg ha-1. It also recorded the maximum grain yield of 14.9 q ha-1, 35.2 % increase in yield over control with cost benefit ratio of 1: 2.7. This treatment was at par with seed priming with T. viride @ 4g kg-1 seed and soil application of karanj and 38% oil cake @ 200kg ha-1 that recorded wilt incidence of 18.1%, grain yield of 14.1q ha-1 and 38% increase in yield over control with cost benefit ratio of Rs. 1: 4.8. Soil application of FYM @ 1.0t ha-1 having T. viride @ 1.0kg q-1 of FYM, recorded 18.3%wilt incidence and 13.8q ha-1 grain yield.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2009-07-16

How to Cite

Barnwal, M. K. (2009). Role of Bioagents and Organic Amendments in the Management of Chickpea Wilt under Field Condition. Journal of Biological Control, 23(2), 199–202. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2009/3653

Issue

Section

Articles

 

References

Bhat, Z. A., Bhat, M. A. and Shawl, A. S. 2003. Comparativeefficacy of biocontrol agents, botanical extractsand fungicides in the management of chickpeawilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.ciceri. In: Proceedings of the National Seminaron Recent Advances in Plant Science Research,12-14 Oct., 2003 pp. 45.

Dhar, V. and Chaudhary, R, G. 2001. Diseases resistance inpulse crops-current status and future approaches,pp. 144-157. In: Nagarajan, S. and Singh, D.P. (Eds.). The role of Resistance in IntensiveAgriculture. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.

Haseeb, A., Sharma, A., Abuzar, S. and Kumar, V. 2006.Evaluation of resistance in different cultivarsof chickpea against Meloidogyne incognita andFusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri under fieldconditions. Indian Phytopathlogy, 59: 234-236.

Kaur, N. P. and Mukhopadhyay, A. N. 1992. Integratedcontrol of chickpea wilt complex by Trichodermaand chemical methods in India. Tropical PestManagement, 38: 20-23.

King, E. O., Ward, M. K. and Raney, D. E. 1954. Two samplemedia for the demonstration of pyocyanin andfluorescence. Journal of Laboratory and ClinicalMedicine, 44: 301-307.

Mukhopadhyay, A. N. 1994. Biocontrol of soil borne fungalplant pathogens-current status, future potential,limitations. Indian Phytopathology, 47: 119-126.

Neelamegam, R. 2005. Effect of different organic mattersources and Trichoderma viride pers. Fr. ondamping off of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumL.) var. CO 1 in the seedling caused by Pythiumindicum Bal. Journal of Biological Control, 19:149-155.

Prasad, R. D, Rangeshwaran, R, Hegde, S.V. and AnuroopC. P. 2002. Effect of soil and seed applicationof Trichoderma harzianum in pigeon pea wiltcaused by Fusarium udum in field conditions.Crop Protection, 21: 293 -297.

Ramakrishnan, S. Gunassekaran, C. R. and SivagamiVedivelu, R. 1997. Efficacy of organics incontrol of Meloidogyne incognita on okra.Indian Journal of Nematology, 27: 46-48.

Rangeshwaran, R. and Prasad, R. D. 2000. Isolation andevaluation of rhizobacteria for control ofchickpea wilt pathogens. Journal of BiologicalControl, 14: 9-15.

Rudresh, D. L., Shivaprakash, M. K. and Prasad, R. D. 2005.Potential of Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agentsof pathogen involved in wilt complex of chickpea.Journal of Biological Control,19: 157-166.