Dynamic Behaviour Of Geodesic Dome Structure For Different Time Histories

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • M. Roopa
     ,IN
  • V. Priyanka
     ,IN
  • H. Venugopal
     ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2022/30679

Keywords:

Time histories, geodesic dome, FEA, dynamic analysis.

Abstract

Earthquake is caused by a sudden release of energy in the earth’s crust, which causes seismic waves. The most significant effects of earthquakes are ground shaking and rupture. It has both social and economic effects, such as causing death and injury to creatures, including humans, and may damage the natural and build environment. It is critical to comprehend the loss of life and damage to structures caused by ground motion. So, the ground motion characteristics are to be studied keenly on any structure in the design process. In the present study different time histories are used to perform dynamic analysis of a geodesic dome using the analytical approach. The results like base shear and joint displacements are obtained with respect to the ground motion time period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2022-07-12

How to Cite

Roopa, M., Priyanka, V., & Venugopal, H. (2022). Dynamic Behaviour Of Geodesic Dome Structure For Different Time Histories. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 70(3A), 120–123. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2022/30679

Issue

Volume 70, Issue 3A, March 2022

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

 

References

C. W. A. I. Hung, (2009: “A Comparative Study of Structural Material for Dome Construction,”

D. Pilarska et al. (2021): “Numerical Analysis of Steel Geodesic Dome under,”

Y. G. Li et al. (2017): “Reliability of lattice dome with and without the effect of using small number of ground motion records in seismic design,” Eng. Struct., vol. 151, pp. 381–390,2017,doi: 10.1016/ j.engstruct. 2017.07.038.

D. M. Wei and S. F. Gao, (2017): “Seismic response analysis of K8 pattern single-layer reticulated domes under vertical rare earthquakes,” Procedia Eng., vol. 210, pp. 417–424, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng. 2017.11.096.

N. Barbieri et al. (2017): “Dynamic Analysis of a Geodesic Dome,” no. July, pp. 1425–1432,2018,doi: 10.26678/abcm.cobem2017.cob17-5951.

L. Lin et al. (2013): “Size Effect and Material Property Effect of the Impactor on the Damage Modes of the Single-Layer Kiewitt-8 Reticulated Dome,” vol. 2013, 2013.

D. Z. Wang et al. (2013): “Impact response and failure mode for single-layer geodesic spherical domes under impact load,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol.351–352,pp.80– 84,2013,doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.351- 352.80.

F. Fan et al. (2004): “Study of the Dynamic Strength of Reticulated Domes under Severe Earthquake Loading,” pp. 235–244, 2004.

Sariyar, O., and Ural, D. N. (2010): “Expert System Approach for Soil Structure Interaction and Land Use.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136(2), 135–138.=https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733 9488(2010)136:2(135)

Provenzano, P. (2003): A fuzzy-neural network method for modelling uncertainties in soil-structure interaction problems. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 18(6), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1467-8667.00326

Levine, E. R., Kimes, D. S. and Sigillito, V. G. (1996): Classifying soil structure using neural networks. Ecological Modelling, 92(1), 101–108.https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0304 3800(95)00199-9

IS 1893: Part 1 (2002): “Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

Most read articles by the same author(s)