Interface Shear Strength of Compacted Clay Liner with Parent Foundation Soil of Turamdih Dam Site and Some Geo-Textile Materials in Composite Liner System

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Dept. of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad ,IN
  • Dept. of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad ,IN
  • Dept. of Applied Geology, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad ,IN

Keywords:

Landfill Liner Interface, Composite Liner System, Shear Strength, Optimum Moisture Content, Large Scale Shear Box.

Abstract

The generation of large quantity of tailing from different ore mines needs an environmentally friendly manner and safe way of disposal. In the case of uranium mineralization the concentration of uranium is very low as compared to other ores deposits and hence the requirement of comparatively larger space for storage of uranium tailing is inevitable. Intense public concern regarding the environmental and health effects of uranium tailings has forced a re-evaluation of past disposal practice. Seepage from bottom and sides need to be protected to avoid underground water pollution to the nearby surrounding areas.

Early liners consisted primarily of a single liner composed of a clay layer or a synthetic polymeric membrane. During the past few decades the trend is to use composite liner systems comprising both clay and synthetic geo-membranes together with interspersed drainage layer. The basic environmental guide lines have contributed in developing suitable liner and hydraulic barriers for landfill site.

The present study involves selection of alternatives between locally available soil of Turamdih dam site with different % of bentonite and fly ash. The choice among them is presented by assessing geotechnical properties of different alternatives. This work addresses the study conducted on performance of landfill liner interface parameters. The stability of composite liner system is based on the evaluation of interface shear strength between (i) Soil and CCL (ii) Geo membrane (HDPE or PVC) and soil (iii) GCL/CCL and soil (iv) Geo-textile and soil (v) GCL/CCL (vi) Geo-membrane and GCL/CCL. The current testing procedures are based on ASTM testing guidelines, where large scale shear box apparatus is proposed to be used for the tests with certain modification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-17

How to Cite

Yadav, B. D., Gupta, S. K., & Singh, S. (2022). Interface Shear Strength of Compacted Clay Liner with Parent Foundation Soil of Turamdih Dam Site and Some Geo-Textile Materials in Composite Liner System. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 64(5), 256–266. Retrieved from https://informaticsjournals.com/index.php/jmmf/article/view/31528

Issue

Section

Articles

 

References

ASTM D5321-02: “Standard Test method for Determining the Coefficient of soil and Geosynthetic or Geosynthetic and Geosynthetic Friction by the Direct Shear Method” Annual Book of ASTM Standard, Vol 04.13.pp 123- 129

ASTM D 6243–98 ‘Standard Test Method for Determining the internal and interface shear resistance of Geosynthetic Clay Liner by the Direct Shear Methods” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.13 pp. 287-293.

ASTM D 3080–98: “Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soil under Consolidated Drained Condition”. Annual Book of ASTM standards, Vol 04.08.pp. 347- 352.

Chiu, P. & Fox, P.J. (2004): “Internal and Interface shear strengths of Unreinforced and needle – punched geosynthetic clay liners: Geo-synthetic International. 11(3). Pp.- 176-199.

Daniel, D.E, Koerner, R.M, Bonaparte, R., Landreth, R.E, Carson, D.A and Scranton, H.B (1998): Slop Stability of Geosynthetic Clay liner test Plots, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE. 124(7): 268-637.

Daniel, D.E., Geotechnical practice for waste Disposal, First edition, Chapman & Hall, London, UK. (1993) Fishman, K.L and Pal, S., (1994): “Further study of geomembrane/cohesive soil interface shear Behavior”, Geotextile and geomembrane, Elsevier science ltd. Vol.13, No.9. Pp 571-590.

Danial, D.E. (1993): Geotechnical practice for waste disposal, Chapman and Hall, London.

Fox. P.J. Rowland M.G. and Schcithe, J.R. (1998): “Internal Shear strength of Three Geosynthetic clay liner”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engg., pp 933-944.

Gilbert, R.B and Byrne, R.J. (1996): Strain- softening behavior of waste containment system interfaces, Geosynthetics International. 3(2) : 181-203.

Gourc, J.P and Reyes Ramirez, R. (2004): Dynamics based interpretation of the interface friction test at the inclined plane. Geosynthetics International. 11(6): 439-454

Triplett E. J. and Fox P.J (June 2001): “Shear strength of HDPE Geomembrane/ Geosynthetic Clay Liner interfaces”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironment Engineering, pp. 543-552.

Hsieh C, Hsieh MW (2003): load plate rigidity and scull effects on the frictional behavior of sand/geomembrane interfaces. Geotext Geometers 21. Pp- 25-27.

Koerner R.M., (1997): “Designing with Geosynthetics” Fourth edition, prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jeresy,

Koutsourais, Mm. Sprague, C. j. and Pucentas, R.C, (1991): “Interfacial Friction Study of cap and liner component for landfill Design”. Geotextile and Geomembrane, Elsevier science Ld., England, Vol. 10 No. 5-6, pp 531-548

Ling, H.I. and Leshchinsky, D. (1997): “Seismic Stabilty and permanent displacement of landfill cover system”. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering. ASCE 123(2): pp . 113-122.

Orman, M.E. (1994): ‘Interface shear strength properties of roughened HDPE”, Journal off Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 4pp. 758 -761.

Saravanam, M. Kamon, M. Ali, F.H. Katsumi. T. and Akai, T. (2008b): “performances of landfill liners under optimum moisture conditions”, The Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (EJEE), 13 (F). (2008a)” landfill interface study on liner member selection for stability:, Vol-13, Bundle-B,

Saravan, M Kamon, Ali, F.H. Katsumi. T. Akai, and T. Nishimura, T.M. (2011): “Performance of landfill liners dry and wet conditions” , Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 29 (5), 881- 898.

Shibuya, S. Mitachi, T. and Tamate, s. (1997): interpretation of direct shear box testing of sands as quasi- simple shear, Geotechnique, 47(4) 767 – 790.

Sivapullaiah, P.V, Laksmikantaha, H. and Kiran, M. (2003): Geotechnical properties of established Indian red earth, Geotechnical and Geotechnical engineering, 21, 399-413.

Sivapullaiah, P.V and lakshmikantaha, H (2004a): Properties of fly ash as hydraulic barrier, Journal of Soil and Sediment Contamination, 13, 1-16.

Sivapullaiah, P.V and Lakshmikantaha, H (2004): Lime stabilized illite as liner, ground improvement journal, 7, 1-7.

Stark T.D and Poeppel, A.R. (1994): Landfill liner interface strength from torsional ring shear tests. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE. 120 (3) 597- 615.

Stark, T.D. Williamson, T.A. and Eid, H.T. (1996): “HDPE Geomembrane/ Geotextile Interface shear strength: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol-122 No.3, pp-197-203 (1996).