Building Evaluation System of Mining Ecological Civilization Construction Based on Entropy Weight Modified AHP Hierarchy Model

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Sanda University, Shanghai, 201209 ,CN

Keywords:

Entropy Weight Modification, AHP Hierarchy Model, Mining Ecological Civilization Construction, Evaluation System.

Abstract

In order to solve the problems in the mining ecological civilization construction with fast update speed, smooth change trend and lack of artificial landmarks, this article proposes an evaluation system of mining ecological civilization construction based on entropy weight modified AHP hierarchy model (EWMAHPHM). This method combines the entropy weight modified AHP hierarchy model and real-time evaluation, firstly establishes the entropy weight modified AHP hierarchy model, then makes entropy weight modification for the predicted residuals, uses the AHP hierarchy model to determine the evaluation indicators of mining ecological civilization construction, and creatively and respectively adopts different entropy weights in the time dimension and space dimension to do weight modification so to have a higher degree of fitness with the reality of social and economic development. The experimental results show that this method can accurately and rapidly evaluate the mining ecological civilization construction in real time and provide reliable confidence assessment, thus have a high practical value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2022-10-23

How to Cite

Cen, H. (2022). Building Evaluation System of Mining Ecological Civilization Construction Based on Entropy Weight Modified AHP Hierarchy Model. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 66(9), 690–696. Retrieved from https://informaticsjournals.com/index.php/jmmf/article/view/31785

 

References

Baorong, Yang, Shiwen, Chunyu, Song, & Zhang (2017): “Study on transformation of ideas of environmental protection administration and construction of mining ecological civilization in China”, meteorological and Environmental Rese EWMAHOHMch, 6(3), pp. 455-471.

Jie F, Kan Z, Wei S, & Dong C. (2013): “Scientific values and rese EWMAHOHMch innovations of human-economic geography in construction of mining ecological civilization”, progress in Geography, 32(2), pp.147-160.

Kreng VB, Wu CY, & Wang IC. (2011): “Strategic justification of advanced manufacturing technology using an extended ahp model”, International Journal of Advanced manufacturing Technology, 52(9-12), pp.1103-1113.

Kun-yong, & Yu-zhen. (2016): “Construction of mining ecological civilization in china: from the perspective of multiple dimensions”, Ecological Economy (1), pp.63-70.

Lai X, Liu G, & Wang H. (2013): “Evaluation and analysis of dea efficiency in construction of mining ecological civilization of jiangsu province”, Disaster Advances, 6, pp.102-108.

Nefeslioglu Ha, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, & Ayas Z. (2013): “A modified analytical hierEWMAHOHMchy process (m-ahp) approach for decision support systems in natural hazEWMaHOHMd assessments”, Computers & Geosciences, 59(1–8), pp.1-8.

Nguyen T, & Nahavandi S. (2016): “Modified ahp for gene selection and cancer classification using type-2 fuzzy logic”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 24(2), pp.273-287.

Wang F, & Shangguan Z. (2013): “Ecological restoration of soil and water and construction of mining ecological civilization”, Science of Soil & Water Conservation, 11(6), pp.119-124.

Yao-Ru Lu, Zhang FE, Qi L, & Zhan-Fei Gu. (2015): “The construction of mining ecological civilization for the environmental security and sustainable development of new urbanization”, Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 36(4), pp.403-412.

Yuan M, & Zhou XW. (2017): “Landfill hainan policy consummation under the construction of mining ecological civilization view”, Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering, 59(1), pp.265-324.