Surface Excavation Assessment in Non-bedded Rock Mass Based on Borehole Information and Seismic Survey

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Centre of Tropical Geonengineering (GEOTROPIK), Institute of Smart Infrastructure and Innovative Construction (ISIIC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, 81310 ,MY
  • Geophysics Section, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang ,MY
  • Centre of Tropical Geonengineering (GEOTROPIK), Institute of Smart Infrastructure and Innovative Construction (ISIIC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, 81310 ,MY
  • Centre of Tropical Geonengineering (GEOTROPIK), Institute of Smart Infrastructure and Innovative Construction (ISIIC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, 81310 ,MY
  • Centre of Tropical Geonengineering (GEOTROPIK), Institute of Smart Infrastructure and Innovative Construction (ISIIC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, 81310 ,MY
  • Centre of Tropical Geonengineering (GEOTROPIK), Institute of Smart Infrastructure and Innovative Construction (ISIIC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, 81310 ,MY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2022/32527

Keywords:

Borehole, Ground Profile, Surface Excavation, Seismic Velocity and Weathering, Tropical

Abstract

One of the most popular indirect methods for investigating the subsurface information is through borehole record. The information obtained from a bore log will provide the subsurface scenario with regard to the soil and rock mass profile, stiffness of the material, weathering grade and quality of the rock material. It is wise to obtain as much as possible useful information from it for any civil engineering design including its excavatability assessment. On the other hand, seismic velocity is also commonly used to describe subsurface information as it furnish actual profile of the subsurface along the survey line. Seismic survey is assumed to be relevant geophysical method to characterize the boundary of soil-rock. Although the field borehole information and seismic method has been widely applied in the ground investigation, their applicability in assessing excavation performance is still debatable, especially when it involves thick soil-rock interaction zone in tropical region. The objective of this study is to investigate the applicability of ground profile obtained from the field borehole information and the seismic survey in surface excavation works. Field studies were carried out ontwo on-going excavation sites namely Nilai and Kota Tinggi involving non-bedded -bedded rock masses, namely granite. This study aims to present the relationship between seismic refraction method and boreholes were to investigate their effectiveness in assessing the ground information for excavation purpose. A sets of boreholeswere drilled approximately on the same path of seismic linesto obtain relationship between those methods. The seismic survey results are evaluated with Standard Penetration Test (SPT), strength index, core recovery (CR) and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) information. Upon obtaining that information, trial excavation were carried out using different size of excavator machines to determine its productivity rate. This study provides useful information on the excavatability of ground materials by using various type of excavating machines, based on the most commonly used of ground investigation tools, which are boreholes and seismic velocity method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-03-12

How to Cite

Abd Manan, A., Tonnizam Mohamad, E., Saad, R., Kusmawati Suparmanto, E., Kiftiah Ahmad Legiman, M., & Slamat, F. (2023). Surface Excavation Assessment in Non-bedded Rock Mass Based on Borehole Information and Seismic Survey. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 70(8), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2022/32527

Issue

Section

Articles

 

References

Mohamad, E. T., Armaghani, E. J., Mahdyar ,A., Komoo, I, Kassim, K. A., & Abdullah, A. (2017). Utilizing regression models to find functions for determining ripping production based on laboratory tests. Measurement, 111, 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.035

Saptono, S., Kramadibrata, S., & Sulistianto, B. (2013). Using the Schmidt hammer on rock mass characteristic in sedimentary rock at Tutupan coal mine. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 6, 390–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. proeps.2013.01.051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2013.01.051

Church, H. K., (1981). Excavation handbook, McGraw- Hill, NY, USA.

Caterpillar Tractor Company. (2001). Caterpillar Performance Handbook. Preoria, Illinois.

Scoble, M. J., & Muftuoglu, Y. V. (1984). Derivation of a diggability index for surface mine equipment selection. Mining Science and Technology, 1(4), 305–322. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0167-9031(84)90349-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9031(84)90349-9

Pettifer, G. S., & Fookes, P. G., (1994). A revision of the graphical method for assessing the excavatability of rock. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 27, 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEGH.1994.027.P2.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEGH.1994.027.P2.05

Franklin, J. A., Broch, E., & Walton, G. (1971). Logging the mechanical character of rock.

McLean, A. C., & Gribble, C. D. (1985). Geology for civil engineers. University of Glasgow.

Karpuz, C. (1990). A classification system for excavation of surface coal measures. Mining Science and Technology, 11, 157–163). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9031(90)90303-A DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9031(90)90303-A

Basarir, H., & Karpuz, C. (2004). A rippability classification system for marls in lignite mines. Journal of Engineering Geology, 74(3–4), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enggeo.2004.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.04.004

Singh, R. N., Denby, B., & Egretli, I. (1987). Development of a new rippability index for coal measures excavations. In The 28th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association.

Tsiambaos, G. & Saroglou, H. (2010). Excavatability assessment of rock masses using the Geological DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0235-9

Strength Index (GSI). Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 69(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10064-009-0235-9

Weaver, J. M. (1975). Geological factors significant in the assessment of rippability. Civil Engineering: South African Institution of Civil Engineer, 17(12), 313–316.

Bieniawski, Z. T. (1974). Estimating the strength of rock materials. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 74(8), 312–320. https://doi. org/10.1016/0148-9062(74)91782-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(74)91782-3

Kirsten, H. A. D. (1982). A classification system for excavating in natural materials. Civil Engineering= Siviele Ingenieurswese, 24(7), 293–308.

Barton, N., Lien, R., & Lunde, J. (1974). Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mechanics, 6(4), 189–236. https://doi. org/10.1007/BF01239496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01239496

Fowell, R. J. & Johnson, S. T. (1982). Rock classification and assessment for rapid excavation, in Strata Mechanics - Developments in Geotechnical Engineering vol 32 (ed: I W Farmer), p. 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444- 42086-2.50046-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-42086-2.50046-6

Smith, H. J. (1986). Estimating rippability by rock mass classification. The 27th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), Tuscaloosa, Alabama; p. 443–448.

MacGregor, F., Fell, R., Mostyn, G. R., Hocking, G., & McNally, G. (1994). The estimation of rock rippability. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 27(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEGH.1994.027.P2.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEGH.1994.027.P2.04

Hadjigeorgiou, J., & Poulin, R. (1998). Assessment of ease of excavation of surface mines. Journal of Terramechanics, 35(3), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 4898(98)00018-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4898(98)00018-4

Norsalkini, M. A. T. S. (2019). Geophysical characterization of weathered sedimentary rock mass for excavation purposes. Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Liang, M., Mohamad, E. T., Faradonbeh, R. S., Armaghani, D. J., & Ghoraba, S. (2016). Rock strength assessment based on regression tree technique. Engineering with Computers, 32(2), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015- 0429-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-015-0429-7

JKR. (2005). Standard Specification for Building Work, (2005 Ed).

Liew, T. C., & Page, R. W. (1985). U-Pb zircon dating of granitoid plutons from the West Coast Province of Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of the Geological Society, 142(3), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.142.3.0515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.142.3.0515

Gobbett, D. J. (1964). The lower palaeozoic rocks of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Federation of Malaya Geological Survey.

Tjia, H. D. (1984). Multi-directional tectonic movements in the schist of Bentong, Pahang.

Pengarah, K. 1985, Peta geologi Semenanjung Malaysia. Jabatan Mineral dan Geosains Malaysia.

Most read articles by the same author(s)