Performance Evaluation of Hypersonic Flow Past Blunt Bodies with Aerospikes using Numerical Techniques

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department of Aeronautical and Automobile Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Udupi, Karnataka ,IN
  • Department of Aeronautical and Automobile Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Udupi - 576104, Karnataka ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/33381

Keywords:

Aerospike, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD), Drag reduction, shock wave, recirculation zones

Abstract

The majority of hypersonic vehicle designs focus on reducing drag and controlling flow enthalpy. Aerodynamic drag is caused by high surface pressure, which creates a detached bow shock in ahead of the blunt nose. These flow separation bow shocks impact hypersonic vehicle speed, range, and heating. Converting the detached shockwave to an attached shock wave (family of the weaker shock) and keeping the dissipation area large enough for a higher heat dissipation rate is a straightforward way to solve aerothermodynamics problems. The most popular technique involves introducing an antennalike structure known as an Aerospike, placed right at the stagnation point over the blunt head. The aerospike contributes to the generation of the attached shock wave, which reduces the pressure drag component and results in recirculation zones over of the nose. This paper evaluates the performance of an aerospike hypersonic vehicle under various off-design conditions using the ANSYS Fluent software. Flow simulations are validated with available experimental data and tested under various turbulence models. All numerical simulations of the vehicle with aerospike are studied in detail, including flow properties such as pressure, temperature, density, turbulence model, etc. The paper concluded that drag reduction results under specific flow conditions were achieved by incorporating the aerospike into the hypersonic vehicle. Furthermore, this paper also contributes to the future research field of hypersonic aeromechanical engineering.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-04-13

How to Cite

Musharraf, S. M., & Srinivas G. (2023). Performance Evaluation of Hypersonic Flow Past Blunt Bodies with Aerospikes using Numerical Techniques. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 71(2), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/33381

 

References

Ahmed, M. Y. M. and Qin, N. (2011): Recent advances in the aerothermodynamics of spiked hypersonic vehicles. In Progress in Aerospace Sciences (Vol. 47, Issue 6, pp. 425–449). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.paerosci.2011.06.001 [2] Aliaga, C., Guan, K., Selvanayagam, J., Stokes, J., Viti, V., and Menter, F. (2020): Hypersonic applications of the laminarturbulent transition SST model in ANSYS fluent. AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum, 1 PartF. https:// doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-3290

Asif, M., Zahir, S., Kamran, N. and Khan, M. A. (2004): Computational Investigations Aerodynamic Forces at Supersonic/ Hypersonic Flow past a Blunt Body with various Forward Facing Spikes.

Bogdonoff, S. M., and Vas , I. E. (1959): Preliminary Investigations of Spiked Bodies at Hypersonic Speeds. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, 26(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.7945

Deng, F., Xie, F., Qin, N., Huang, W., Wang, L., and Chu, H. (2018): Drag reduction investigation for hypersonic lifting-body vehicles with aerospike and long penetration mode counterflowing jet. Aerospace Science and Technology, 76, 361–373. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ast.2018.01.039

Feszty, D., Richards, B. E., Badcock, K. J., and Woodgate, M. A. (2000a): Numerical simulation of a pulsating flow arising over an axisymmetric spiked blunt body at Mach 2.21 and Mach 6.00. In Shock Waves.

Gupta, D. (2017): International Journal of Research In Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering Divyang Gupta Drag Reduction of Hypersonic Vehicles using aerospike.

Han, R., Liu, W., Yang, X., and Chang, X. (2021): Dynamic Drag Reduction Effects of Aerospikes and Aerodisks. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/ 9370331.

Huebner, L. D., Mitchell, A. M., and Oudreaux, E. J. (n.d.). Experimental Its on the Feasibility of an Aerbspike for ersonic.

Sidney R. Alexander. (1953): Results of Tests to Determine The Effect of A Conical Windshield on The Drag of a Bluff Body at Supersonic Speeds. NACA Resarch Abstracts, 2.

Kalimuthu, R. and Rathakrishnan, E. (2008): Aerospike for Drag Reduction in Hypersonic Flow

Khurana, S. and Suzuki, K. (2013): Assessment of aerodynamic effectiveness for aerospike application on hypothesised lifting-body in hypersonic flow. 31st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. https:// doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-2513

Kim, H. and Lee, M. (2021): Flow simulation of a supersonic airplane with installed engine nacelle. Aerospace Science and Technology, 117. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106900

Mair, W. A. (1952a): LXVIII. Experiments on separation of boundary layers on probes in front of blunt-nosed bodies in a supersonic air stream. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 43(342),695–716. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14786440708520987

Mansour, K. and Khorsandi, M. (2014): The drag reduction in spherical spiked blunt body. Acta Astronautica, 99(1), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.actaastro.2014.02.009

Mehta, R. C. (2009): Flow Field Computations Over Conical, Disc and Flat Spiked Body at Mach 6.

Miliæev, S. S. and Pavloviæ, M. D. (2002): Influence of spike shape at supersonic flow past blunt-nosed bodies: Experimental study. AIAA Journal, 40(5), 1018– 1020. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1745

N, S. S. (2013): Numerical Analysis of Aero-Spike Nozzle for Spike Length Optimization. 1, 1–14.

Results of Tests of Determine the Effect of. (n.d.).

Robert Piland, B. O., P utland, L. W. and Putland, L. W. (1954): I-RM L54A27 ZE Ro-Lift Drag of Seve Ral Conical and Blunt Nose Shapes Obtained In F Re E F Light At Mach Numbers of 0.7 T O 1. 3 Naca Rm L54a27 National Advisory Committee For Aeronautics Research Memorandum

Saxena, S., Mahesha, G. T. and Srinivas, G. (2020): Recent aerodynamic performance evaluation of commercial and non-commercial vehicles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1706(1). https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-6596/1706/1/012220

Sebastian, J. J., Suryan, A. and Kim, H. D. (2016): Numerical analysis of hypersonic flow past blunt bodies with aerospikes. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 53(4), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33414

Sheikh, N., Singh, S. N., Veeravalli, S. V. and Hegde, S. (2020): Effect of Reynolds number and boundary layer thickness on the performance of V-cone flowmeter using CFD. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101728

Sims, W. H., Boylan, D. E. and Hahn, J. S. (1965): Drag on blunt bodies with and without spikes in low-density hypersonic flow. AIAA Journal, 3(2), 365–366. https:// doi.org/10.2514/3.2863.

Srinivas, G., and Potti, S. R. (2014): Computational analysis of fighter aircraft wing under Mach number 0.7 for small sweep angles. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 592–594, 1020–1024. https://doi.org/ 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.592-594.1020

Srinivas, G. and Prakash, M. V. S. (2017): Aerodynamics and flow characterisation of multistage rockets. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 197(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/197/1/012077

R. Yadav and U. Guven. (2013): Aerothermodynamics of a hypersonic projectile with a double-disk aerospike. Aeronautical Journal, 117(1195), 913.

Yamauchi, M., Fujii, K. and Higashino, F. (1995). Numerical investigation of supersonic flows around a spiked blunt body. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 32(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.26571

Aakash, K., Aditya, A. and Srinivas, G. (2019): Recent developments of modern avionic systems in aeronautical applications. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(12 Special Issue), 923-929. doi:10.5373/JARDCS/V11SP12/ 20193294.