Performance Evaluation of the Manufacturing Process For the Proposed Design Modification of the Kingpin

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Tarun Kumar Yadav
     Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shri Jagdishprasad Jhabarmal Tibrewala University, Jhunjhunu - 333001, Rajasthan ,IN
  • Anshul Gangele
     Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior - 474 005, Madhya Pradesh ,IN
  • Nitish Kumar Gautam
     Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shri Jagdishprasad Jhabarmal Tibrewala University, Jhunjhunu - 333001, Rajasthan ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/36252

Keywords:

Lean Manufacturing, Measuring System Analysis (MSA), Metal, Process Flow Diagram (PFD), SPC

Abstract

The manufacturing process of a metallic kingpin plays an important role in determining its fatigue life. Several machining processes are carried out which induce different kinds of stresses in the material. In order to relieve these stresses heat treatment processes are carried out. This may lead to certain dimensional defects in the part. In order to ensure the quality of the manufactured part different quality control techniques are used. The goal of this paper is to evaluate the overall performance of the manufacturing process for a modified king pin design. For this purpose, the MSA and SPC techniques have been used find out the acceptability of the measuring system and the stability of the quality control process for the manufacturing of the proposed king pin design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Yadav, T. K., Gangele, A., & Gautam, N. K. (2023). Performance Evaluation of the Manufacturing Process For the Proposed Design Modification of the Kingpin. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 71(11), 2389–2403. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/36252

Issue

Volume 71, Issue 11, November 2023

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

 

References

Khot SS, Navthar RR. Design and optimization of front axle of heavy truck. Int J Eng Appl Sci Technol. 2019; 4(4):183–191. doi: 10.33564/ijeast.2019.v04i04.031.

Freeman J. What is process flow diagram? An Easy Guide with Tricks. Edrawsoft. 2020; 1–7.

Wdowik R, Magdziak M, Ratnayake RMC, Borsellino C. Application of process parameters in planning and technological documentation: CNC machine tools and CMMs programming perspective. Procedia CIRP. 2018; 78:43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.09.054.

Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG). Measurement Systems Analysis: Reference Manual. 4th ed; 2010.

Charts R. Tables of constants for control charts Table. Inst Qual Reliab. 2020; 1–3.

Ermer DS. Improved gage R&R measurement studies. Qual Prog. 2006; 39(3):77–79.

Rauwendaal C. Statistical process control in extrusion. Plast world. 1995; 53(3):97–103.

Chen X, Wang Y. Research on the function and the application flow of SPC system. Proceeding 2012 Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Innov. Manag. Ind. Eng. ICIII 2012. 2012; 3:461–463. doi: 10.1109/iciii.2012.6340017.