Andrews Bridge Fixed Removable System: A Clinical Case Report

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Medical Officer (Dental), Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, R.U.H.S. College of Dental Sciences, Jaipur – 302016, Rajasthan ,IN ORCID logo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8309-1600
  • Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, R.U.H.S. College of Dental Sciences, Jaipur –302016, Rajasthan ,IN
  • Senior Demonstrator, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, R.U.H.S. College of Dental Sciences, Jaipur – 302016, Rajasthan ,IN
  • Senior Demonstrator, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, R.U.H.S. College of Dental Sciences, Jaipur – 302016, Rajasthan ,IN
  • Medical Officer (Dental), Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, R.U.H.S. College of Dental Sciences, Jaipur – 302016, Rajasthan ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2022/28728

Keywords:

Alveolar Bone Defect, Andrews Bridge, Fixed Dental Prosthesis. Fixed-Removable, Removable Partial Denture

Abstract

The aesthetic zone presents a dilemma for prosthetic rehabilitation. Prosthetic restoration of significant alveolar bone loss in the aesthetic zone is often challenging. The Andrews Bridge fixed removable system can be used in such cases as it combines the benefits of a Fixed Partial Denture (FPD) with the aesthetics of a Removable Partial Denture (RPD) to restore lost teeth and gingiva while addressing the aesthetic challenge of significant alveolar bone loss. It reduces the denture bulk and provides good retention and patient comfort. There is no need for palatal or lingual flange covering, as in a regular RPD.

Published

2022-07-26

How to Cite

Sharma, V., Paliwal, J., Meena, K. K., Raigar, R. L. L., & Yadav, P. (2022). Andrews Bridge Fixed Removable System: A Clinical Case Report. Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), 36(1), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2022/28728

Issue

Section

Case Report

 

References

Pietrokovski J and Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent. 1967; 17:21–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7

Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla following tooth extraction. Aust Dent J. 1969; 14:241–4. PMid:5259350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1969.tb02290.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1969.tb06001.x

Gardner MF and Stankewitz CG. Using removable gingival facades with Fixed Partial Dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 47:262–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90153-6

Andrews JA. The Andrew Bridge: A Clinical Guide. Covington, La., The Institute of Cosmetic Dentistry, 1976. p. 1–99.

Everhart RJ and Cavazos E. Evaluation of a fixed Removable Partial Denture: Andrews bridge system. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50:180–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/00223913(83)90008-2

Mueninghoff LA and Johnson MH. Fixed- Removable Partial Denture. J Prosth Den. 1982; 5:547–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90360-2

Cheatham JL, Newland JR, Radentz WH and O’Brien R. The ‘fixed’ Removable Partial Denture: Report of case 1984; 109:57–9. PMid: 6379018. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0256

Seibert JS. Reconstruction of deformed partially edentulous ridges using full thickness onlay grafts: Part I. Technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1983; 4:437–53.

Seibert JS and Cohen DW. Periodontal considerations in preparation for fixed and removable prosthodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1987; 31:529–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0011-8532(22)02086-9

Seibert JS. Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1983; 4:437–53.

Andrews JA and Biggs WF. The Andrews Bar-and sleeve-Retained Bridge: A clinical report. Dentistry Today. 1999; 18:94–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.1985.1662871