Anodic Behaviour of Ti-12 in Various Electrolytes

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • U. Raghavender
     Department of Chemistry, University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad-500007, Telangana ,IN
  • K. Vijay Kumar
     Department of Chemistry, University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad-500007, Telangana ,IN
  • E. Rajasheker Reddy
     Department of Chemistry, University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad-500007, Telangana ,IN
  • A. Panasa Reddy
     Department of Chemistry, University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad-500007, Telangana ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jsst/2018/16027

Keywords:

Anodization, Constant Current Density, Formation Rate, Titanium-12

Abstract

Anodization of Ti-12 alloy has been carried out in various electrolytes at different constant current densities and temperatures. Kinetics of anodic films was studied in different electrolytes at different constant current densities ranging from 4mAcm-2 to 64mAcm-2 and at different temperatures ranging from 298 to 338K. From the plots of formation voltage (V) vs time (t), rates of formation were calculated. The rate of film formation and breakdown voltage increase with increase in constant current density while decrease with increase in temperature. The kinetics were found better in sulphamic acid electrolyte at room temperature compared to other electrolytes at the same anodizing conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

U. Raghavender, Department of Chemistry, University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad-500007, Telangana

Department of Chemistry

Downloads

Published

2019-01-03

How to Cite

Raghavender, U., Vijay Kumar, K., Rajasheker Reddy, E., & Panasa Reddy, A. (2019). Anodic Behaviour of Ti-12 in Various Electrolytes. Journal of Surface Science and Technology, 34(3-4), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.18311/jsst/2018/16027

Issue

Volume 34, Issue 3-4, December 2018

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Received 2017-05-10
Accepted 2018-07-26
Published 2019-01-03

 

References

D. M. Brunette, P. Tengavall, M. Textor and P. Thomsen, Springer, 171 (2001).

H. Luckey, and F. Kubli, ASTM, 796 (1981).

G. R. Parr, L. K. Gardner, and R. W. Toth, J. Posthent. Dent., 54, 410 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/00223913(85)90562-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90562-1

J. E. G. Gonzalez and J. C. Minza-Rosca, J. Electroanal. Chem., 471, 109 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S00220728(99)00260-0

K. S. Brammer, C. J. Frandsen and S. Jin, Trends Biotechnol., 30, 315 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.02.005 PMid:22424819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.02.005

S. L. De-Assis, S. W. Solynec and I. Costa, Electrochim. Acta., 51, 1815 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.121

F. H. Jones, Surf. Sci. Rep., 42, 75 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(00)00011-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(00)00011-X

R. Narayanan, H. J. Lee, J. Y. Kwon and K. H. Kim, Mater. Chem. Phys., 125, 510 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.10.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.10.024

G. K. Mor, O. K. Varghese, M. Paulose, K. Shankar, and C. A. Grimes, Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. Cell., 90, 2011 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2006.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2006.04.007

Z. M. Yan, T. W. Guo, H. B. Pan and J. J. Yu, Mater. Trans., 43, 3142 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.43.3142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.43.3142

M. V. Diamanti, B. Del Curto, C. Passaro and M. P. Pedeferri, Color. Res. Appl., 37, 384 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/ col.20683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/col.20683

M. Kisaichi, Surf. Technol., 40, 66 (1989). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4139/sfj.40.66

B. B. Secley, Metal. Progress, 9, 35 (1982).

R. S. Hyam, and D. Choi, RSC ADV., 3, 7057 (2013). https:// doi.org/10.1039/c3ra40581h DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra40581h

V. Jeevana Jyothi, and Ch. Anjaneyulu, E J. Chem., 6, 880 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/579860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/579860

Ch. Anjaneyulu, Thesis, Osmania University, 1981.

G. Raghunathreddy, A. Lavanya and Ch. Anjaneyulu, Bull. Electrochem., 22, 235 (2006).

P. Baskar Reddy and A. Panasa Reddy, Bull. Electrochem., 19, 481 (2003).

T. Aerts, Th. Dimogerontakis, I. D. Graeve, J. Fransaer and H.Terryn, Surf. Coating. Tech., 201, 7310 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.01.044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.01.044

P. Michal, A. Vagaska, E. Fechova, M. Gombar and D. Kozak, METABK, 55, 403 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2016_09_201662