Exploring ‘Luxury Brand Management’ as a Separate Area of Study


  • CMS Business School, Jain University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560009, India


The ever-increasing income levels across the globe have given an impetus to the luxury segment, giving rise to a variety of career opportunities. The theories that govern marketing and consumer behaviour in luxury management need to be different from other forms of marketing due to the distinct characteristics that define luxury. Much of extant marketing literature base their analyses and models on non-luxury brands, as a result of which, it has so far little relevance for luxury brands. This approach permeates through management education, rendering management graduates ill prepared for a career in the luxury industry. This paper explores the uniqueness in the concept of luxury and traces the origins of its specificities, from which one may discern the ‘anti-laws’ of marketing that apply to luxury management. This concept paper identifies four distinct ways in which luxury management differs from other forms of brand management, namely in terms of a) Positioning and brand image: While regular brands strive to occupy ‘unoccupied’ market positions, luxury brands are expected to make competition irrelevant; b) Customer relationship management: The all-pervading ‘customer is king’ thought process cannot be directly applicable to luxury, wherein luxury brands need to indulge the customers and yet be aloof; c) The role of advertising: Luxury advertising aims to create aspirations rather than increase sales and the target audience goes far beyond its target market and d) Price and demand: Contrary to traditional economic theories, a higher price is expected to increase the demand for luxury brands.


Luxury, Luxury Brand Management, Uniqueness of Luxury Management

Subject Discipline

Marketing, Brand Management, Luxury Brand Management, Management education

Full Text:


Arienti, P. (2017). Global Powers of Luxury Goods 2017, The New Luxury Consumer [online] Available at: https://www2. deloitte. com/content/ dam/Deloitte/global. Documents/consumer-industrialproducts/ gx-cip-global-powers-luxury-2017.pdf [Accessed 19 Sep. 2017].

Jain S. India’s historical luxury fables. Sinha D, editor. The luxury market in India: Maharajas to masses. UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2012.

Kapferer, J. N., & Bastien, V. (2009). The specificity of luxury management: Turning marketing upside down. Journal of Brand Management, 16(5-6), 311322.

Veblen T. The Theory of the Leisure Class. 1899.AM Kelley, bookseller; 1965.

Credit Suisse Research Institute. Global Wealth Report 2015 [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jun 8]. Available from: Available at: http://www.protothema.gr/ files/1/2015/10/14/ekthsi_0.pdf

Capgemini and RBC Wealth Management. World Wealth Reports 2015. World Wealth Reports [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jun 8]. Available from: Available at: https://www.worldwealthreport.com/ download.

Truong Y, Mccoll R, Kitchen PJ. New luxury brand positioning and the emergence of masstige brands.Journal of Brand Management. 2009; 16(5–6):375– 82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/bm.2009.1

Benady D. Masstigeproduct: Eat, drink and be merry. Marketing Week, 22-23 [Internet]. [cited 2008]. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/ docview/228206621?accountid=139266

Royo-Vela M, Voss E. Downward price-based brand line extensions effects on luxury brands. Business and Economics Research Journal. 2015; 6(3):145.

Han YJ, Nunes JC, Drèze X. Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence.Journal of Marketing. 2010; 74(4):15–30.

Wiedmann KP, Hennigs N, Siebels A. Measuring consumers’ luxury value perception: A cross-cultural framework. Academy of Marketing Science Review. 2007; 7(7):333–61.

Krueger D, Perri F. Does income inequality lead to consumption inequality? Evidence and theory. The Review of Economic Studies. 2006; 73(1):163–93.

Davies IA, Lee Z, Ahonkhai I. Do consumers care about ethical-luxury?. Journal of Business Ethics.2012; 106(1):37–51.

Schaninger CM. Social class versus income revisited: An empirical investigation. [Internet]. [cited 1981]. Available from: Retrieved from http:// search.proquest.com/docview/208824955?accoun tid=139266

Renner W, Ramalingam P, Pirta RS. Moral universals, ancient culture and indian youth: Part II - facing the challenge of westernization. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology. 2014; 40(1):9–19.

Kinra N. The effect of country-of-origin on foreign brand names in the Indian market. Marketing Intelligence and Planning. 2006; 24(1):15–30.

Lowther B. Saris and Louis Vuitton: luxury brands eyeing India for future growth. Womens Wear Daily. 2005 May:1–7.

Dubois, B., Laurent, G., & Czellar, S. (2001).Consumer rapport to luxury: Analyzing complex and ambivalent attitudes (No. 736). HEC Paris.

Heine, K. (2012). The concept of luxury brands.Luxury brand management, 1, 2193-1208.

Keynes, J. M. (1963). A self-adjusting economic system.Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business, 2(2), 11-15.

Kemp S. Perceiving luxury and necessity. Journal of Economic Psychology. 1998; 19(5):591–606.

Petrova S, Pruzhansky V. The economics of luxury goods: Utility based on exclusivity; 2011.

Spence M. Job Market Signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics (The Quarterly Journal of Economics.1973; 87(3)355–374.

Wong NY, Ahuvia AC. Personal taste and family face: Luxury consumption in Confucian and Western societies. Psychology and Marketing. 1998; 15(5):423–41.

Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation.Psychological review. 1943; 50(4):370.

Mann M. Ruling class strategies and citizenship.Sociology. 1987; 21(3):339–54.

Mitchell T. The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics. The American Political Science Review. 1991; 85(1):77.

Mortelmans D. Sign values in processes of distinction: The concept of luxury. Semiotica. 2005; 2005(157):497–520.

Baudrillard J, Levin C. For a critique of the political economy of the sign. Telos Press Publishing; 1981.

Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of consumer research, 15(2), 139-168.

Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard business review.

Van Herpen, E., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M.(2009). When demand accelerates demand: Trailing the bandwagon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 302-312.

Wiedmann KP, Hennigs N, Siebels A. Valueâ€based segmentation of luxury consumption behavior.

Psychology and Marketing. 2009; 26(7):625–51.

Verhallen, T. M. (1982). Scarcity and consumer choice behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(4), 299-322.

Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature.Psychology & Marketing, 8(1), 43-57.

Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & Maclnnis, D. J. (1986).Strategic brand concept-image management. The Journal of Marketing, 135-145.

Miller, K. W., & Mills, M. K. (2012). Probing brand luxury: A multiple lens approach. 00Journal of Brand Management, 20(1), 41-51.

Trout J, Ries A. Positioning: The battle for your mind.McGraw-Hill; 1986.

Brooksbank R. The anatomy of marketing positioning strategy. Marketing Intelligence and Planning.

; 12(4):10–14.

Graham H. Marketing strategy and competitive positioning. Pearson Education India; 2008.

Kapferer , J . N. (2008 ) The New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term , 4th edn., London: Kogan Page Limited.

Kotler P. Marketing management: The millennium edition. Marketing Management. 2000; 23(6): 188–93.

Fuchs C, Prandelli E, Schreier M, Dahl DW. All that is users might not be gold: How labeling products as user designed backfires in the context of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Marketing. 2013; 77(5):75–91.

Liu F, Li J, Mizerski D, Soh H. Self-congruity, brand attitude, and brand loyalty: a study on luxury brands. European Journal of Marketing. 2012; 46(7/8):922–37.

Dubois, B., & Laurent, G. (1994). Attitudes towards the concept of luxury: an exploratory analysis. ACR Asia-Pacific Advances.

Lavidge RJ, Steiner GA. A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. The Journal of Marketing. 1961; 59–62.

Lucas. DB, Britt SH. Measuring advertising effectiveness; PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA,

Hennigs N, Wiedmann KP, Klarmann C. Luxury brands in the digital age–exclusivity versus ubiquity.

Marketing Review St. Gallen. 2012; 29(1):30–5.

Fionda AM, Moore CM. The anatomy of the luxury fashion brand. Journal of Brand Management. 2009; 16(5–6):347–63.

Kapferer, J. N. (2012). The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking.Kogan page publishers.

Dion D, Borraz S. Managing heritage brands: A study of the sacralization of heritage stores in the luxury industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2015; 22:77–84.

Taylor CR, Franke GR, Bang HK. Use and effectiveness of billboards: perspectives from selectiveperception theory and retail-gravity models.Journal of advertising. 2006; 35(4):21–34.

Yeoman I, McMahon-Beattie U. Luxury markets and premium pricing. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management. 2006; 4(4):319–28.

Hornig T, Fischer M, Schollmeyer T. The role of culture for pricing luxury fashion brands. Marketing ZFP. 2013; 35(2):118–30.

Fassnacht M, Kluge PN, Mohr H. Pricing luxury brands: Specificities, conceptualization and performance impact. Marketing ZFP. 2013; 35(2):104–17.

Colchester M. Hermès seduces the elite by selling luxury slowly. The Wall Street Journal [Internet].

[cited 2009 May 8]. Available from: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB124172264754197157.

Forbes. The World’s Billionaires [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jun 8]. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/

Kapferer JN. Abundant rarity: The key to luxury growth. Business Horizons. 2012; 55(5):453–62.

Leibenstein H. Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.1950; 64(2):183–207.

Rajadhyaksha N. The curious economics of luxury brands. LiveMint. [Internet]. [cited 2011 Mar 25]. Available from: http://www.livemint.com/ Home-Page/W8eexIwEwMoy6zTb1n5vGO/Thecuriouseconomics-of-luxury-brands.html.

Rucker DD, Galinsky AD. Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2009; 45(3):549–55.


  • There are currently no refbacks.