A study on five sampling methods of parasitic hymenopterans in rice ecosystem


  • Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu
  • Director of Research, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu
  • Department of Plant Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu
  • Department of Rice, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu
  • Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore -641003, Tamil Nadu




Efficiency, parasitoids, rice, sampling, traps


For insect diversity studies to be of value, the sampling methods employed must produce samples representative of the community or taxon selected for the investigation. However, as yet, few evaluations on the variability and effectiveness of sampling methods have been undertaken. The survey was carried out in the rice fields during 2015-16 in Paddy Breeding Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. From this study a total of 1,019 parasitoid individuals were collected. Among six different collection methods employed for sampling hymenopteran parasitoids in rice ecosystem, the yellow pan trap at ground level was found to be the most effective method in trapping the parasitoids (27.2 ± 2.56 parasitoids per day) followed by sweep net method (12.1 ± 1.03 parasitoids per day). The next best sampling method is yellow pan trap erected at canopy level which recorded a mean of 9.2 ± 2.26 parasitoids per day. The other three traps viz., malaise trap, suction trap and light trap were found to collect less number (<1.5) of parasitoids per day.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


Campbell JW, Hanula JL. 2007. Efficiency of malaise traps and colored pan traps for collecting flower visiting insects from three forested ecosystems. J Insect Conserv. 11: 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841006-9055-4

Daniel JA, Ramaraju K. 2017. A study of three methods of sampling chalcididae and Pteromalidae In Major Rice Ecosystems of Tamil Nadu. J Exp Zool India 20(2): 1037–1041.

Darling DC, Packer L. 1988. Effectiveness of Malaise traps in collecting Hymenoptera: the influence of trap design, mesh size and location. Can Entomol. 120: 787–796. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent120787-8

Devigne C, Biseau J. 2014. Urban ecology: Comparison of the effectiveness of five traps commonly used to study the biodiversity of flying insects. Biodivers J. 5: 165–174.

Fritz LL, Heinrichs EA, Machado V, Andreis TF, Pandolfo M, Salles SM, Oliveira, JV. 2011. Diversity and abundance of arthropods in subtropical rice growing areas in the Brazilian south. Biodivers Conserv. 20(10): 2211–2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0083-3

Heckman CW. 1979. Rice field ecology in North East Thailand. Monogr Biol. 34: 228.

Heong KL, Aquino GB, Barrion AT. 1991. Arthropod community structures of rice ecosystems in the Philippines. Bull. Entomol Res. 81(4): 407–416. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0007485300031977

Hollingworth JP, Hartstack AWT, Lingren PD. 1970. The spectral response of Campoletis perdistinctus. J Econ Entomol. 63: 1758–1761. https://doi.org/10.1093/ jee/63.6.1758

Jervis DI, Padoch C, Cooper HD. 2007. Managing biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems. Columbia University Press. pp. 34–76. https://doi.org/10.7312/jarv13648 Jonathan JK. 2006. Ichneumonologia Indica, Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae. Zool Suru India, Kolkata. 160p.

Kennedy JS, Booth C, Kershaw WJS. 1961. Host finding by aphids in the field by visual attraction. Ann Appl Biol. 49: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1961.tb03587.x

Kirk WD. 1984. Ecologically selective coloured traps. Ecol Entomol. 9: 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.19 84.tb00696.x

La Salle J, Gauld ID. 1993. Hymenoptera: Their diversity and their impact on the diversity of other organisms. In: Lasalle J and Gauld, ID. (Eds.). Hymenoptera and biodiversity. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. pp. 1–26.

Narendran TC. 1994. Torymidae and Eurytomidae of Indian subcontinent (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Zoological monograph. Calicut. 493p.

Narendran TC. 2001. Parasitic Hymenoptera and biological control: Palani Paramount Publications, Palani, India. pp. 6–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1377-3_1

Noyes JS. 1989. A study of five methods of sampling Hymenoptera (Insecta) in a tropical rainforest, with special reference to the Parasitica. J Nat Hist. 23: 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938900770181

Noyes JS. 2017. Universal Chalcidoidea Database. World Wide Web electronic publication. Retreived from: hhtp:// www.nhm.ac.uk/chalcidoids.

Rajmohana K. 2006. Studies on Proctotrupoidea and Platygastroidea (Hymenoptera: Insecta) of Kerala.

Memoirs Zool Surv India. 2(1): 1–53.

Shweta M, Rajmohana K. 2016. A comparison of efficiencies of sweep net, yellow pan trap and malaise trap in sampling Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Insecta). J Exp Zool India. 19: 393–396.

Spafford RD, Lortie CJ. 2013. Sweeping beauty: is grassland arthropod community composition effectively estimated by seep netting? Ecol Evol. 3: 3347–3358. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.688

Sureshan PM. 2008. Pteromalinae (Pteromalidae: Chalcidoidea: Hymenoptera) of Indian Subcontinent. Rec zool Surv India 205: 1–170.

Wells W, Decker T. 2006. A comparison of three types of insect traps for collecting non-Formicidae Hymenoptera on the Island of Dominica. Southwest. Entomology 31: 59–68.




How to Cite

Daniel, J. A., Ramaraju, K., Kumar, S. M., Jeyaprakash, P., & Chitra, N. (2018). A study on five sampling methods of parasitic hymenopterans in rice ecosystem. Journal of Biological Control, 32(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2018/22104



Research Articles