Influence of Cutting Drum Specifications on the Production Performance of Surface Miner under Varied Rock Strength – Some Investigations

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department of Mining Machinery Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad ,IN
  • Department of Mining Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad ,IN
  • Department of Mining Machinery Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad ,IN
  • Central Institute of Mining & Fuel Research, Dhanbad ,IN

Keywords:

Surface Miner, Uniaxial Compressive Strength, Normalized Production, Depth of Cut.

Abstract

Application of surface miners has increased phenomenally all around the world for rock excavation in varied rock mass conditions. There are numerous models of surface miners with wide range of specifications. Machine specifications, specially, power and drum dimensions (drum width and diameter) as well as operating parameter, i.e., depth of cut are related to production. This is in addition to the allowable cutting speed (m/s). Ability of surface miner to operate and cut effectively in rock is limited to strength property of rock. Uniaxial compressive strength of rock is one of the important controlling parameters for excavation by surface miner. An in-depth knowledge of rock and machine interaction is imperative for smooth operation and mass production of surface miner. The paper presents the influence of uniaxial compressive strength of rock on normalized production for varied rock types. Production has been projected for different machine specifications especially, drum width, drum diameter and depth of cut (i.e., contact area of drum) and machine power for rocks having different uniaxial compressive strength. Production has also been analyzed with varying depth of cut for different rock strength. Combining various machine and rock parameters an empirical relation has been established to predict the production for a given surface miner of known power rating. Alternately, the power required for achieving a given production can also be arrived from the developed equation. However, the actual production could vary depending on the structure of rocks, abrasivity of material and also the cutting drum design variations (vane spacing, pick spacing, angle of wrap, etc.) which need further studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2022-10-17

How to Cite

Kumar, C., Murthy, V. M. S. R., Kumaraswamidhas, L. A., & Prakash, A. (2022). Influence of Cutting Drum Specifications on the Production Performance of Surface Miner under Varied Rock Strength – Some Investigations. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 64(5), 181–186. Retrieved from https://informaticsjournals.com/index.php/jmmf/article/view/31510

Issue

Section

Articles

 

References

Wirtgen Surface Miners in Operation Around the Globe (2013): Job Report. Website: www.media.wirtgen-group.com.

Ghose, A. K. (2008): New technology for surface mining in the 21 st century – emerging role for surface miners. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 56 (3 & 4), 41-43.

Prakash, A., Murthy,V. M. S. R., and Singh, K. B. (2013): Rock excavation using surface miners: An overview of some design. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 23, 33-40.

Ghose, A. K., Schimm, B., and Niyogi, S. (2001): New Technology for Surface Mining in the 21st Century-Emerging Role for Surface Miners. Mine Planning and Equipment Selection.

Dey, K., and Bhattacharya, J. (2012): Operation of Surface Miner: Retrospect of a Decade Journey in India. Procedia Engineering, 46, 97-104.

Prakash A. (2013): A study into the influence of intact rock and rock mass properties on the performance of surface miners in Indian geo-mining conditions. PhD thesis, Indian School of Mines Dhanbad.

Wirtgen Surface Mining Manual (2010): Applications and Planning Guide. Website: www.wirtgen.com.

Origliasso, C., Cardu, M., and Kecojevic, V. (2013): Surface Miners: Evaluation of the Production Rate and Cutting Performance Based on Rock Properties and Specific Energy. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 47, 757-770.

Jones, I.O., and Kramadibrata, S. (1995): An excavating power model for continuous surface miners. Ausimm Proc, 300 (2), 33-40, ISSN : 1034-6783.

Prakash, A., Murthy, V. M. S. R., and Singh, K. B. (2013): Performance simulation of surface miners with varied machine parameters and rock conditions: some investigations. Journal of Geology and Mining Research, 5, 12-22.

Roxborough F.F., and Pedroncelli, E.J. (1982): A practical evaluation of some coal cutting theories using a continuous miner. Min Eng.