Comparative Study of Wear Behaviour of Heat Treated 304 Austenitic and 410 Martensitic Stainless Steel

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Arijit Mukherjee
     Department of Mechanical Engineering, Swami Vivekananda University, Kolkata - 700121, West Bengal ,IN
  • Santosh Kumar
     Department of Mechanical Engineering, ARMIET College of Engineering and Management, Mumbai – 400601, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Ranjan Kumar
     Department of Mechanical Engineering, Swami Vivekananda University, Kolkata - 700121, West Bengal ,IN
  • Sayan Paul
     Department of Mechanical Engineering, Swami Vivekananda University, Kolkata - 700121, West Bengal ,IN
  • Soumak Bose
     Department of Mechanical Engineering, Swami Vivekananda University, Kolkata - 700121, West Bengal ,IN
  • Suman Kumar Ghosh
     Department of Mechanical Engineering, Swami Vivekananda University, Kolkata - 700121, West Bengal ,IN
  • Samrat Biswas
     Department of Mechanical Engineering, Swami Vivekananda University, Kolkata - 700121, West Bengal ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/36038

Keywords:

Friction and Wear, Heat Treatment, Micro Hardness, Tribology, Stainless Steel 304, 410

Abstract

A heat treatment is the process of treating workpiece to a certain temperature (i.e., below or above recrystallization temperature), soaking for a certain time and subsequent cooling in a definite medium or rate, in order to get the improved or controlled mechanical properties, like strength, toughness, hardness, ductility, and internally developed residual stress. In addition to seeking enhanced mechanical properties, conventional heat treatment is also sought for its ability to improve corrosion resistance. To improve the service life of engineering element, the application of heat treatment has become necessary to deal with tool and die, automotive parts or aerospace parts. This paper focuses on the influences of various heat treatments in their dry sliding characteristics i.e., tribo-characteristics of two type of stainless steel 304 and ss410. Total six numbers of SS 304 and five numbers of SS 410 was taken and they have been heated to some desired temperature and then they are allowed to dwell. Then these heated specimens are cooled in some predetermined ways (air, water, oil or in furnace) to get various treatment results. A comparative study of pin against disc friction and wear for SS-304 and SS-410 was carried out in a multi tribo tester (DUCOM TR201E) against EN-24 steel disc. Corresponding micro hardness valued are also determined in HV scale in a Micro Vickers Hardness Tester (Economet VH-1 MD).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Mukherjee, A., Kumar, S., Kumar, R., Paul, S., Bose, S., Ghosh, S. K., & Biswas, S. (2023). Comparative Study of Wear Behaviour of Heat Treated 304 Austenitic and 410 Martensitic Stainless Steel. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 71(11), 2110–2115. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/36038

Issue

Volume 71, Issue 11, November 2023

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

 

References

Ludema KC. Friction, Wear, Lubrication: A Textbook in Tribology. CRC Press, USA, 1996.

Kumar S. Effect of Microstructure on the Wear Behavior of Heat Treated SS-304 Stainless Steel. Tribology in Industry. 2016; 38(4):445-53.

Tanwer AK. Effect of Various Heat Treatment Processes on Mechanical Properties of Mild Steel and Stainless Steel. American International Journal of Research in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. 2014; 8(1):57-61.

Baldissera P. Deep cryogenic treatment of AISI 302 stainless steel: Part II - Fatigue and corrosion, Materials and Design. 2010; 31:4731-4737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. matdes.2010.05.015

Ramosa BL. Tribocorrosion and Electrochemical Behavior of DIN 1.4110 Martensitic Stainless Steels After Cryogenic Heat Treatment. Mater Res. 2017; 20(2):460- 8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-0341

Johnpaul C. Effect of Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Welded AISI 410 Martensitic Stainless Steel. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2016 Apr.; 3(4):7-12. https://doi. org/10.17148/IARJSET.2016.3402

Chowdhury MA, Nuruzzaman DM, Chowdhury MAK, Roy BK. Experimental study of friction coefficient and wear rate of turned and ground mild steel surfaces sliding against smooth and rough SS304 counterfaces. Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2014 Oct.; 12(3):291-304. https://doi.org/10.7158/M13- 022.2014.12.3

https://steel.gov.in/

Fadare DA, Fadare TG, Akanbi DY. Effect of heat treatment on mechanical properties and microstructure of NST 37-2 steel. Journals of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering. 2011; 10(3):299-308. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2011.103020

Edward LW. Heat-Treating of Materials.1992, pp. 383- 387.

Doerr C, Kim J-Y, Singh P, Wall JJ, Jacobs LJ. Evaluation of Sensitization in Stainless Steel 304 and 304L using Nonlinear Rayleigh Waves, NDT and E International. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2017

Nadum IN et al. The Effect of Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of Stainless Steel Type 304. IJSER. 2015 Aug; 3(8):87-93.

Biswas S, Barman TK, Sahoo P. Surface Roughness Modeling in Turning of Brass Using Response Surface Methodology. Recent Trends in Manufacturing Technology (RTMT- 09). 2009; pp. 1-6.

Biswas S, Barman TK, Sahoo P. Analysis of Surface Roughness Modeling in Mild Steel Turning Using Response Surface Methodology. Emerging Trends in Mechanical Engineering (ETME- 09), MS03. 2020; pp. 1-6.