Management of A Mutilated Orthodontic Case Through A Multidisciplinary Approach- A Case Report

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College & Hospital, Sector 7, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400 614 ,IN
  • Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College & Hospital, Sector 7, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400 614 ,IN
  • Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College & Hospital, Sector 7, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400 614 ,IN

Keywords:

Cross Bite, FORSUS, Midline Shift
Endodontics

Abstract

A female patient aged 35 years reported with mutilated occlusion with mid line shift, aggravation of skeletal Cl II with posterior cross bite on patient's right side. This was a case of Skeletal Class II Div 1 malocclusion which had been treated previously by other operator with extraction of all 1st premolars except in upper right quadrant. Multidisciplinary approach was taken to resolve all the problems as follows: mid line shift & cross bite were corrected by the orthodontist with application of "FORSUS: Fatigue Resistant Device”, the odontome was eliminated by the oral surgeon, reconstruction of a premolar crown was done by the specialist in esthetic conservative dentistry & gingival grafting on a canine was done by the Periodontist. The objective of this presentation is to demonstrate the satisfactory outcome of the multidisciplinary approach in a mutiliated occlusion.

Published

2018-09-12

How to Cite

Gangurde, P., Vadgaonkar, V., & Shah, A. (2018). Management of A Mutilated Orthodontic Case Through A Multidisciplinary Approach- A Case Report. Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), 28(2), 54–60. Retrieved from https://informaticsjournals.com/index.php/jpfa/article/view/22228

Issue

Section

Case Report

 

References

Campbell E. A Prospective Clinical Analysis of a Push-type Fixed Intermaxillary Class II Correction Appliance. thesis. University of Connecticut,Farmington; 2003.

Pancherz H, Hagg U. Dentofacial Orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:273-297.

Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara Jr JA. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod. 2000;118:335-340.

Malmgren O, Omblus J, Hagg U, Pancherz H. Treatment with an orthopedic appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods:A study of initial effects. Am J Orthod. 1987;91:143-151.

Jones G, Buschang PH, Kim KB, Oliver DR. Class II nonextraction patients treated with the Forsus fatigue resistant device versus intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:332-338.

Aras A, Ada E, Saracoglu H, Gezer NS, Aras I. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;140:616-625.

Gu¨ nay EA, Arun T, Nalbantgil D. Evaluation of the immediate dentofacial changes in late adolescent patients treated with the Forsusâ„¢ FRD. Eur J Dent. 2011;5:423-432.

Von Bremen J, Pancherz H. Efficiency of early and late class II div I treatment. Am J Orthod. 2002;121:31-37.