Single Incision Technique for Two-point Fixation of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures


Affiliations

  • Tamilnadu Government Dental College and Hospital, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
  • Madras Medical College and Hospital, Department of Plastic Surgery, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
  • Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Department of Dental Surgery, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to discuss the Y modification of transconjunctival approach in the management of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures.

Study design: 10 patients with unilateral ZMC fractures were included in this study. All patients were treated by two-point fixation through single incision by the Y modification of trans- conjunctival approach. The average follow up period was 6 months. The adequacy of expo- sure, cosmetic outcomes, intraoperative, and postoperative complications were evaluated.

Results: The exposure was excellent in all patients with good cosmetic outcomes. None of the patient had any intraoperative complications; postoperatively, one patient had mild displacement of lateral canthus and other had mild hyperpigmentation of scar.

Conclusion: The transconjunctival Y modification is a relatively new technique and provides excellent exposure and good esthetics. Yet, studies on large cohort needed to use this approach in the routine management of ZMC fractures.


Keywords

Infraorbital Approaches, Transconjunctival Approach, Two-point Fixation, Y Modification, Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures

Subject Discipline

Dentistry

Full Text:

References

Zachariades N, Mezitis M, Anagnostopoulos D. Changing trends in the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: a 12-year evaluation of methods used. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56:1152–1156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90759-5.

Donald PJ. Zygomatic fractures. In: English GM, ed. Otolaryngology: A Text Book. Hagerstown, MD: Medical Dept, Harper & Row; 1976.

Bourquet J. Les hernies graisseuse de l'orbite: Notre traitment chirurgical. Bull Acad Med. 1924;92:1270.

Tenzel RR, Miller GR. Orbital blow-out fracture repair, conjunctival approach. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971;71:1141.

McCord Jr CD, Moses JL. Exposure of the inferior orbit with fornix incision and lateral canthotomy. Ophthalmic Surg. 1979;10:53–63.

Martinez AY, Bradrick JP. Y modification of the transconjunctival approach for management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: a technical note. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:97–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.05.009.

Feldman EM, Bruner TW, Sharabi SE, Koshy JC, Hollier LH. The subtarsal incision: where should it be placed? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:2419–2423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.008.

Couly G, Hureau J, Tessier P. The anatomy of the external palpebral ligament in man. J Maxillofac Surg. 1976;4:195–197.

Holtmann B, Wray RC, Little AG. A randomized comparison of four incisions for orbital fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67:731–735.

Ridgway EB, Chen C, Colakoglu S, et al. The incidence of lower eyelid malposition after facial fracture repair: a retrospective study and meta-analysis comparing subtarsal, subciliary, and transconjunctival incisions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1578.

Wray RC, Holtmann B, Ribaudo JM, Keiter J, Weeks PM. A comparison of conjunctival and subciliary incisions for orbital fractures. Br J Plast Surg. 1977;30:142–145.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.