A Study of Etiology, Clinical Profile and Outcome of Patients Presenting with Acute Urinary Retention to a Tertiary Care Hospital

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Professor and Head, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Former PG Resident, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/mvpjms/2020/v7i2/24560

Keywords:

Acute Urinary Retention, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Suprapubic Catheterization, Transurethral Resection of Prostate, Trial Without Catheter, Urethral Stricture

Abstract

Introduction: Acute urinary retention (AUR) is defined as the sudden inability to pass urine even with a distended bladder. A population-based study reported the incidence AUR of 2.2 to 6.8 per 1000 men per year. One in 10 men over the age of 70 may experience AUR within 5 years. In contrast, AUR is rare in women. Definitive management of AUR depends on the precipitating cause which can be medical or surgical. Immediate treatment of AUR is to drain the urinary bladder either by urethral catheterization or by a suprapubic cystostomy. Prospective studies on AUR are few in India, and very less is known regarding its prevalence. In view of this, there is a need to formulate a baseline data in the area of acute urinary retention. Aims and Objectives: 1. To study etiology of Acute Urinary Retention in patients presenting at Tertiary Care Hospital. 2. To study the clinical profile of patients presenting with Acute Urinary Retention to a Tertiary Care Hospital. Material and Methods: It is a Prospective Observational Study conducted on patients visiting the Emergency department, OPD and/or cases admitted in the IPD for Acute Urinary Retention in the department of General Surgery at Tertiary Care Hospital. Relevant history was taken and detailed clinical examination along with appropriate investigation including ultrasonography, etc. were carried out in all cases. Appropriate medical (including medication, urethral catherization or suprapubic catherization) or surgical treatment (like surgeries for urethral stricture, phimosis, urethral calculus etc.) was given to the patient as per standard hospital protocols. Results: Mean Age of the study group was 61.54 years with majority of the patients 68% were more than 60 years of age. Male preponderance was observed in the study group with prevalence ratio of 48 (96%) males to only 2 (4%) females. Most common etiology of acute urinary retention was benign prostate hyperplasia (44%) followed by urethral stricture (26%), carcinoma prostate (6%), phimosis (6%) and bladder neck calculi (4%). Foley's catheterization was done in 41 cases (82%) while supra-pubic catheterization was done in 9 cases (18%) cases. Out of the 36 cases in which trial without catheterization was attempted, 32 were successful. Out of the 45 cases with surgical management, TURP was done in 22 cases while Urethrotomy and Cystolithotrypsy was done in 12 and 4 cases. TURP + bilateral orchidectomy and circumcision was done in 3 and 2 cases respectively. Conclusion: The most common age for presentation with Acute Urinary Retention is 51-70 years and with male predominance. In our study we can conclude that the most common etiology for AUR is Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia followed by Urethral Stricture, Carcinoma of Prostate and Phimosis. The primary management to relieve the retention in an emergency situation is mainly by urethral catheterization failing which Suprapubic catheterization is done but definitive management for AUR is surgical.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-31

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

 

References

Rosenstein D, Mcaninch JW. Urologic emergencies. Medical Clinics of North America. Mar 2004; 88(2): 495– 518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-7125(03)00190-1

Armitage J, Sibanda N, Cathcart P, Emberton M, Meulen J. Mortality in men admitted to hospital with acute urinary retention: database analysis. BMJ. 2007; 335(7631): 1199– 1202. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39377.617269.55

Yenli EM, Aboaha K, Gyasi-Sarponga CK, Azorliade R, Arhina AA. Acute and chronic urine retention among adults at the urology section of the Accident and Emergency Unit of Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana. African Journal of Urology. 2015 Aug 18;21(2):129-36.

https://patient.info/doctor/acute-urinary-retention# (Accessed on 08.06.2021)

Fitzpatrick JM, Kirby RS; Management of acute urinary retention. BJU Int. Apr 2006; 97 Suppl 2:16–20; discussion 21–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06100.x

Fitzpatrick JM, Desgrandchamps F, Adjali K, Guerra LG, Hong SJ, Khalid SE, Ratana"Olarn K, Reten"World Study Group. Management of acute urinary retention: a worldwide survey of 6074 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU international. 2012 Jan;109(1):88-95.

Abdullahi M, Yunusa B, Mashi SA, Aji SA, Alhassan SU. Urinary Retention in Adults Male Patients: Causes and Complications among Patients Managed in a Teaching Hospital in North Western Nigeria. Open Journal of Urology. 2016; 6(07): 114. https://doi.org/10.4236/ oju.2016.67020

Fitzpatrick JM, Desgrandchamps F, Adjali K, Guerra LG, Hong SJ, Khalid SE, Ratana"Olarn K, Reten"World Study Group. Management of acute urinary retention: a worldwide survey of 6074 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU international. 2012 Jan;109(1):88-95.

Thomas K, Chow K, Kirby RS. Acute urinary retention: a review of the aetiology and management. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2004; 7: 32. https://doi.org/10.1038/ sj.pcan.4500700

Choong S, Emberton M. Acute urinary retention. BJU Int 2000; 85: 186. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464- 410x.2000.00409.x

Manikandan R, Srirangam SJ, O'Reilly PH, Collins GN. Management of acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in the UK: a national survey. BJU international. 2004 Jan;93(1):84-8.

Desgrandchamps F, De La Taille A, Doublet JD; RetenFrance Study Group. The management of acute urinary retention in France: A cross-sectional survey in 2618 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 2006; 97: 727–33. Back to cited text no. 21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464- 410X.2006.06109.x

Mohamed SH, El Ebiary MF, Badr MM. Early versus late trail of catheter removal in patients with urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia under tamsulosin treatment. Urological Science. 1 Nov 2018; 29(6): 288.

Kumar V, Marr C, Bhuvangiri A, Irwin P. A prospective study of conservatively managed acute urinary retention: prostate size matters. BJU Int. 2000; 86: 816–819. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00918.x