Income, Employment and Saving Patterns of Migrant Women Workers in the Construction Industry


Affiliations

  • Kamaraj College, Department of Economics, Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu, 628003, India

Abstract

The research paper is based on income, employment and saving patterns of internal migrant women workers in the construction industry, with special reference to Coimbatore city of Tamil Nadu state in India. The women workers face several problems such as wage discrimination, sexual harassment and poor sanitation in the study area. Sanitation is one of the most environment quality issues linked with population growth. Access to bathroom and restroom facilities is strong indicators. In the study, it was found that 82.4 percent of the construction workers suffer from this problem. The main objective of the study is socio-economic status, income, employment and saving patterns. The study is based on primary data collected using a pre-tested interview schedule. As the information of migrant women workers in the construction sector is not known, 100 migrant women workers were approached as respondents from each of the five zones of Coimbatore City, based on convenient sampling method. But for want of complete set of information, the response of 22 respondents was dropped and the sample size stood at 478. The study reveals that migrant women workers were working on an average five days a week and eight hours a day. In the case of current wage per day, the average wage was found to be Rs. 391. The same was Rs. 132.24 per day at their native place (before migration). On an average, migrant woman workers are saving Rs. 844.87 per month. The wage level of the migrant women workers before the migration was very low compared to the prevailing wage rate of the migrated locality. The lower wage rate in the native place was the reason for women workers to opt for migration for getting higher wage rate. Hence, the wage rate is the dominant factor responsible for the migration of women workers.


Keywords

Income, Employment, Migrant Women Workers, Saving Pattern, Socio-Economic Status

Full Text:

References

Asia-Pacific Migration Report (2015). Migrants Contributions to Development.

Belwal, S. and Belwal, R. (2014). Work-Life Balance, Family-Friendly Policies and Quality of Work Life Issues: Studying Employers Perspectives of Working Women, Journal of International Women’s Studies. 15(1).

Fielden L. Sandra, Marilyn J. Davidson, Andrew W. Gale and Caroline L. Davey (2000). Women in construction: The untapped resource, Construction Management and Economics. 18(1):113-121, ISSN 0144-6193, print ISSN 1466-433X. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900371004.

Ghaffari, H. and Singh, S. P. (2000). Pull-Push determinants of inter-provincial migration: Iran’s case study, Indian Journal of Economics. 81(321):269-275.

Imran Faisal, Yasir Nawaz, Muhammad Asim and Arshad Hashmi, H. (2013). Socio-Economic determinants of rural migrants in urban setting: A study conducted at City Sargodha, Pakistan, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2(1):71. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n1p71.

Milligan and Mand Bohara, A. (2007). The Effect of Remittances on Child Labor and Child Education in Nepal. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 33022493.

Michael, A. Quinn (2005). Remittances, savings and relative rates of return, The Journal of Developing Areas. 38(2):1-23. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2005.0028.

Neetha, N. (2014). Making of female breadwinners migration and social networking of women domestics in Delhi, Economic and Political Weekly. April 24 2014.

Rameez, Abbas and Divya, Varma (2014). Emerging pattern of urbanization and contribution of migration in urban growth in India, Asian Population Studies. 5(1): 2-20.

Regassa and Yusufe (2007). Correlates of rural outmigration in Southern Ethiopia, Journal of Social and Economic Development. 9(1):25-37.

United Nations (2016). International Migration Report 2015, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

World Migration Report 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.