Comparative evaluation of various techniques of biomechanical preparation: A SEM study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2010/18343

Keywords:

Hand instrumentation, Ultrasonic system. Profile system, SEM.

Abstract

Proper debridement of contaminated system is paramount as a pre condition for successful treatment This depends on meticulous removal of contaminates from within the anatomic irregularities of root canal. Considering the claim of the new various systems being marketed for effective biomechanical preparation, we carried out the study to evaluate the various techniques available for cleaning and shaping the root canals; viz. hand instrumentation, ultrasonic system and profile system with the help of SEM for proper debridement of canal and opening of dentinal tubules. Profile give maximum result followed by ultrasonic and hand instrumentation

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Ramesh Chandra

Career Post Graduate Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Lucknow, U.P. India

Ambrish Kaushal

Career Post Graduate Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Lucknow, U.P. India

Ram Autar

Career Post Graduate Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Lucknow, U.P. India

Amit Anand

Career Post Graduate Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Lucknow, U.P. India

Anshul Chandra

Uttar Pradesh Dental College and Research Centre, Lucknow, U.P. India.

References

Bishop, K., and Dummer, P.M. (1997) A comparison of stainless steel Flexofiles and nickel - titanium NiTi Flex files during the shaping of simulated canals. Int. Endodont J., 30, 25-34.

Chou, H.G., Lin, C.P., Kuo, J.C, and Lan, W.H. (1997) Scanning electron microscope evaluation of the cleanliness of a new ultrasonic root endpreparation. J. Formo MediAsso., 96, 727-33.

Craig L.W., Harold H.M. and Mahmoud E.E (1990) The effect of varying ultrasonic power setting on canal preparation. J. of Eudodon 16, 273-278.

David, P., Mahmoud, E., Harold, H., and Messer. (1986) Hand Versus Ultrasonic instrumentation: its Effect on Canal Shape and Instrumentation time. J. Endodon., 12, 375-381.

Glosson, C.R., Halier, R.H., Dove, S.B. and del Rio C.E.(1995) A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex.endontic instruments. J. of Endodon. 21, 146151.

Goldberg, F. andAraujo, J.A. (1997) Comparison of three instrument in the preparation of curved root canals. Endod. Dent. Traumatol. 13, 265-268.

Kasai, Y (1975) Experimental study on root canal irrigation by ultrasonics, Kanagawa. Dent. Coll.110, 1-30.

Kobayashi, C. Yoshioka, T, and Suda, H. (1997) A new engine-driven canal preparation system with electronic-canal measuring capability. J.Endodon.. 23, 751-54.

Martin. (1976) Ultrasonic disinfection of the root canal.0. Surgery., 42, 92-9.

Min, M.M., Cecil, E.B., Joseph, J.L., and Kafrawy, A.H.(1997) investigated structural alterations in resected roots. J. of Endodon., 23, 624-628.

Richman, M.J., (1957) Use of Ultrasonics in root canal therapy and root resection. J. Dent. Med., 12,1218.

Roig,C.M., Basilio, M.J., Abos, H.R., Brau, A.E., and Canalda, S.C. (1997). A comparison of molar root canal preparations using six instrumentation techniques. J. Endodo., 23, 383-6.

Schafer, E. and Lau, E. (1999) Comparison of cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals and nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J. of Endodo. 25, 427-430.

Siqueira Junior, J.F., Lima, K.C., Magalhaes, F.A., Lopes, H.P., and de, U.M. (1999) Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal by three instrumentation techniques. J. Endodo., 25, 332-5.

Walmsley, A.D., Lumley, P.J, Johnson, W.T., and Walton, R.E. (1996) Breakage of ultrasonic root end preparation tips. J. Endodon., 22, 287-289.

Waplington, M., Lumley, P.J. and Blunt, L. (2000) An in vitro investigation into the cutting action of ultrasonci radicular access preparation instmments. Dental Traumat, 16, 158-161.

Zmener, 0., and Banegas, G. C1996) Compared 3 instrumentation techniques in the preparation of simulated curved canals. Int. Endodon J., 29, 315-319.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-06

How to Cite

Chandra, R., Kaushal, A., Autar, R., Anand, A., & Chandra, A. (2017). Comparative evaluation of various techniques of biomechanical preparation: A SEM study. Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health, 10(3-4), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2010/18343

Most read articles by the same author(s)