Indigenous Ball and Socket Implant Supported Mandibular Overdenture: A Case Report


Affiliations

  • Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Department of Dental Research & Implantology, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences (INMAS), Delhi, 110054, India
  • Army Dental Centre (Research & Referral), Delhi, 110010, India

Abstract

Edentulism is a major health concern of old age. Indigenous implant based over dentures offer a cost effective option for severely resorbed dental ridges. Here, we report rehabilitation of a resorbed mandibular arch with indigenous implant supported overdenture and maxillary arch with a conventional denture. Two ball and socket implants were placed bilaterally in the parasymphyseal area. Existing denture was relined to accommodate the ‘ball head’ of the implant in the interim period. Four months later, when patient was taken up for denture fabrication, the ‘socket part’ of the ball and socket implant was incorporated into the new denture base. The socket provided a fitting surface for the implant. Implant supported overdenture significantly increased the retention, support and stability of the lower denture. Further, it worked well with the upper conventional denture. The simple design and efficacy of indigenous implant based overdenture holds promising aspects in the treatment of edentulism.

Keywords

Edentulism, Ball And Socket Implants, Implant Supported Overdenture

Subject Discipline

Dentistry

Full Text:

References

Cunha-Cruz J, Hujoel PP, Nadanovsky P. Secular trends in socio-economic disparities in edentulism: USA, 1972e2001. J Dent Res. 2007;86:131-136.

Petersen PE. The World Health Report 2003: Continuous Improvement of Oral Health in the 21st Century e The Approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme; 4-5.

Tallgren A, Lang BR, Miller RL. Longitudinal study of soft tissue profile changes in patients receiving immediate complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4:9-16.

Fenton AH. The decade of overdentures: 1970e1980. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:31-36.

Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24e25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:601-602.

Payne AG, Solomons YF. The prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular mucosa and implant supported overdentures: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:238-243.

The edentulous mandible: an organized approach to implant supported overdentures. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 3rd ed. Mosby: Elsevier; 2012:293-313.

Babbush CA, Kent JN, Misiek DJ. Titanium plasma spray (TPS) Swiss screw implants for the reconstruction of the edentulous mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:247-282.

Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, et al. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:117-122.

Crum RJ, Rooney GE. Alveolar bone loss in overdenture: A five-year study. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;6:610-613.

Gotfredsen K, Holm B. Implant supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: A randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:125-130.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.