Assessment of Nasal Tip Projection and Rotation in Different Types of Malocclusions in Maharashtrian Population: A Photographic Study

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Pushkar Andhare
     Resident, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune ,IN
  • Sanjeev Datana
     Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune ,IN
  • Shiv Shankar Agarwal
     Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune ,IN
  • S. K. Bhandari
     Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2021/26695

Keywords:

Malocclusion, Nasal Tip Projection, Nasal Tip Rotation

Abstract

Introduction: Nose holds an anatomically strategic position on face which influences the facial aesthetics and soft tissue profile of an individual, making it indispensable to understand the variations in nasal features and influence of different factors on it. Present study aims at assessing nasal tip projection and nasal tip rotation among patients with different sagittal skeletal relations and vertical facial patterns in Maharashtrian population using photographic analysis. Materials and Methods: Records of 410 patients with age ranging from 17 to 25 yrs were selected from the institutional archives; to assess the nasal projection and rotation. Data obtained was divided into groups depending on the type of sagittal skeletal relation and vertical facial pattern and subjected to the statistical analyses. Results: Nasal tip projection was greater among patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion (mean 0.39) as compared to other malocclusion types, but did not differ significantly (P-value>0.05). Nasal tip rotation was clockwise among patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and anticlockwise in Class I and Class II malocclusion patients, which was statistically significant (P-value<0.05). Amongst the patients with different vertical facial pattern, no statistically significant result could be obtained for nasal tip projection and rotation. Conclusion: The result of the present study gives an insight about the nasal features prevalent among different types of malocclusion, thus assisting the clinician in treatment planning and achieving good facial aesthetics with pleasing soft tissue profile.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-14

How to Cite

Andhare, P., Datana, S., Agarwal, S. S., & Bhandari, S. K. (2021). Assessment of Nasal Tip Projection and Rotation in Different Types of Malocclusions in Maharashtrian Population: A Photographic Study. Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), 35(2), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2021/26695

Issue

Volume 35, Issue 2, June 2021 (Special Issue Orthodontics)

Section

Original Articles

License

All the articles published in JPFA are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).

 

References

William RP, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2015. P. 5.

Naini FB. Facial aesthetics concept and clinical diagnosis. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK. 2011. p. 214-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786567

Vegter F, Hage JJ. Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106:1090-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-20001000000021

Kanan UG, Achleshwar G, Apurva D. Morphometric variation in nose types of Gujarati population. Asian J Med Res. 2012; 1:118-20.

Rajlakshmi CH, Singh MS, Devi HB. Singh CL. Cephalic index of foetues of Manipuri population- A baseline study. J Anat Soc India. 2001; 50:8-10.

Franciscus RG, Long JC. Variation in human nasal height and breadth. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991; 85:419-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330850406

Hall RL, Hall DA. Geographic variation of native people along the Pacific Coast. Hum Biol. 1995; 67:407-26.

Roelofse MM, Steyn M, Becker PJ. Photo identification: Facial metrical and morphological features in South African males. Forensic Sci Int. 2008; 177:168-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.12.003

Ackerman JL, Proffit WR. Soft tissue limitations in orthodontics: Treatment planning guidelines. Angle Orthod. 1997; 67:327-36.

Nehra K, Sharma V. Nasal morphology as an indicator of vertical maxillary skeletal pattern. J Orthod. 2009; 36:160-6. https://doi.org/10.1179/14653120723148

Ideal Photographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Available from: https://www.americanboardorthod.com

Fitzgerald JP, Nanda RS, Currier GF. An evaluation of the nasolabial angle and the relative inclination of the nose and upper lip. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1992; 102:328-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70048-F

Subtelny JD. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. Am J Orthod. 1959; 45:481-507.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(59)90014-4

Behrents R. JCO/interviews Dr. Rolf Behrents on adult craniofacial growth. J Clin Orthod. 1986; 20:842-7.

Chaconas SJ. A statistical evaluation of nasal growth. Am J Orthod. 1969; 56:403-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(69)80007-2

Khare V, Niwlikar KB. Effect of vertical maxillary skeletal pattern on nasal morphology in high and low angle cases. Int J Oral Health Med Res. 2017; 3:75-9.