Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers and Decentralization Initiatives in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study of SNGs in Kenya

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department of Public Policy and Administration, Kenyatta University, P.O Box 43844, Nairobi ,KE
  • Department of Public Policy and Administration, Kenyatta University, P.O Box 43844, Nairobi ,KE
  • Department of Economic Theory, Kenyatta University, P.O Box 43844, Nairobi ,KE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/sdmimd/2022/29505

Keywords:

County Governments, Decentralization, Local Governments, Local Revenue Decisions, Subnational Government (SNGs)

Abstract

Intergovernmental fiscal transfer is a pillar of fiscal decentralization initiatives in developing and transition economies. These transfers serve several functions that include: correcting the vertical and the horizontal fiscal balances, compensating or offsetting for the spill-overs or externalities between different jurisdictions, funding national priorities and administrative priorities and capacities of the national. However, SNGs in developing countries particularly in Sub-saharan Africa is struggling with fiscal decentralization initiatives due to the lowered potential of local revenue generation. Due to these gaps in studies on Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers (IGFT) in devolved government structures, the study evaluated how IGFT is organized and structured in Kenya. The study adopted a descriptive design and undertook a review of publicly available data which was supported by interviews of selected directors from the budget, finance and planning departments in three county governments of Baringo, Kiambu and Vihiga. The study established that intergovernmental fiscal transfers make up 87 per cent of SNG revenues, equalization fund is about 2 per cent while own source revenues make up 10 per cent. Other revenue sources are conditional transfers in form of ad hoc and cost-reimbursement approaches from both the national government and development partners. Regarding intergovernmental fiscal transfers, the national government should disburse funds in a timely and efficient manner to enable county governments to fulfil their mandates. The study makes the following conclusions; there is an overreliance on intergovernmental fiscal transfers by SNGs and this might constrain their capacity to provide services and impede devolution initiatives; the formula-based unconditional grant in Kenya offers great prospects for devolution and the rise in unconditional transfers portends well for SNGs. The study recommends that SNGs speed up the legal mechanism for identifying and classifying and assigning local revenues, the national government should consider introducing or substituting fiscal transfers with the tax-sharing arrangement to incentivize revenue diversification among SNGs and lastly, SNGs should consider pooling of resources to incorporate special purpose vehicles for sub-national government borrowing. The study contributes to the existing knowledge by delving more into the elements of fiscal decentralization and in particular intergovernmental fiscal transfers. Recommendations for further studies include studies on how other elements of decentralization impact the performance of the counties, how decentralization is improving governance at the local level and how the East African Community may affect governance and service delivery at the sub-national levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2022-03-01

How to Cite

Rutto, A., Minja, D., & Kosimbei, G. (2022). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers and Decentralization Initiatives in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study of SNGs in Kenya. SDMIMD Journal of Management, 13(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.18311/sdmimd/2022/29505

Issue

Section

Research Papers

 

References

Alam, M. (2014). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers in developing countries: Case Studies from the Commonwealth (Vol. 5). Commonwealth Secretariat.

Bagaka, O. (2008). Fiscal decentralization in Kenya: The constituency development fund and the growth of government. Proceedings of 20th Annual Conference of the Association for Budgeting and Financial Management, Chicago, October 23-25, 2008, Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1312983

Bahl, R., Boex, J., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2001). The Design and implementation of intergovernmental fiscal transfers. Atlanta, Georgia: International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Roy-Bahl/publication/265572590_The_Design_and_Implementation_of_Intergovernmental_ Fiscal_Transfers/links/54b68a3b0cf24eb34f6d2b9d/ The-Design-and-Implementation-of-IntergovernmentalFiscal-Transfers.pdf

Bird, R. M., & Smart, M. (2002). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: International lessons for developing countries. World Development, 30(6), 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00016-5

Bird, R. M., & Tarasov, A. V. (2004). Closing the gap: Fiscal imbalances and intergovernmental transfers in developed federations. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 22(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0328

Broadway, R., & Shah, A. (2009). Fiscal federalism: Principles and practices of multiorder Governance. Cambridge University Press. Policy Research Working Paper. No. 1385. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511626883

Controller of Budget (2019). Consolidated County Budget Implementation Review Reports.

https://cob.go.ke/reports/consolidated-county-budgetimplementationreview-reports/#153189847042539d1a1ee-66ca

Durham, S., & Verwey, L. (2012). South African Budget Guide and Dictionary. Idasa Pretoria

Fan, Y., Wu, Y., Wu, A. M., & Wang, W. (2018). Decentralised governance and empowerment of county governments in China: betting on the weak or the strong? Local Government Studies, 44(5), 670–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1473766

Fjeldstad, O. H., & Heggstad, K. (2012). Local government revenue mobilisation in Anglophone Africa. ICTD Working Paper 7. Available from: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2408608 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.2408608. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2408608

Freille, S., & Capello, M. (2014). Electoral effects of intergovernmental fiscal transfers: An application to local elections in the province of Cordoba, 1995– 2011. Revista de economía y estadística, 52(1), 113–35.

Fumey, A., & Egwaikhide, F. O. (2018). Political economy of intergovernmental fiscal transfers: The rural?urban dynamics in Ghana. African Development Review, 30(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12310

Garello, P. (2016). French sub-national public finances: on the difficulty of being a decentralized unitary state. In Multi-level Finance and the Euro Crisis. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715113

Government of Kenya. (2021). Commission on revenue allocation reports.

Government of Kenya. (2021). The constitution of Kenya 2010.

Government of Kenya (2016). Draft National Policy to Support Enhancement of County Governments’ OwnSource Revenue. https://countytoolkit.devolution.go.ke/resource/national-policy-support-enhancementcountygovernments-own-source-revenue-national

Government of Kenya (2021). The constitution of Kenya 2010.

Government of Kenya (2021). Commission on revenue allocation.

Kitchen, H. (2007). Grants to small urban governments. Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 319–38.

Llanto, G. M. (2012). The assignment of functions and intergovernmental fiscal relations in the Philippines 20 years after decentralization. Philippine Review of Economics, 49(1), 37–80.

Lewis, B. (2013). Local government capital spending in Indonesia: Impact of intergovernmental fiscal transfers. Public Budgeting & Finance, 33(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2013.12002.x

Lewis, B. D., & Smoke, P. (2017). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers and local incentives and responses: The case of Indonesia. Fiscal Studies, 38(1), 111–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12080

Martinez?Vazquez, J., Lago?Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12182

Marton, J., & Wildasin, D. E. (2007). State government cash and in-kind benefits: Intergovernmental fiscal transfers and cross-program substitution. Journal of Urban Economics, 61(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2006.04.006

Mikayilov, E. (2007). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers in Azerbaijan: role of tax-sharing in local government financing. Economic Research Center, Central European Initiative. Available from: http://pdc.ceu.hu/ archive/00003356/01/MIKAYILOV.pdf

Miyazaki, T. (2021). Economies of scope and local government expenditure: evidence from creation of specially authorized cities in Japan. Sustainability, 13(5), 2684. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052684

Miyazaki, T. (2016). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers and Tax Efforts: Evidence from Japan. MPRA Paper No.74337. Available from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74337/

Mitullah, W. V., Odhiambo, M., & Kichamu, A. (2005). Management of resources by local authorities: The case of Local Authority Transfer Fund. Nairobi: Claripress.

Mitullah, W. V. (2012). Decentralized service delivery in Nairobi and Mombasa: Policies, politics and intergovernmental relations (No. 2012/92). WIDER Working Paper.

Mogeni, S. M. (2017). Impact of the local authority transfer fund LATF on service delivery: A case of the County Council of Garissa. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(7), 1851–55. https://doi.org/10.21275/1061702

Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120–49. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.3.1120

Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International tax and public finance, 12(4), 349–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797005-1619-9

Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. number 14708, June Polity IV Dataset. Available from: http://www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/inscr/polity

Otieno, J. O., Rambo, C. M., & Odundo, P. A. (2014). Contribution of local authority transfer fund to debt reduction in Kenyan local authorities. Global Journal of Business Research, 8(3), 57–68.

Robinson, M. (2007). Introduction: Decentralising service delivery? Evidence and policy implications. IDS Bulletin, 38(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2007.tb00332.x

Searle, B., & Ahmad, E. (2005). On the implementation of transfers to subnational governments. IMF Working Papers 2005/130, International Monetary Fund. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfwpa/2005-130.html. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451861495.001

Schroeder, L., & Smoke, P. (2003). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: concepts, international practice, and policy issues. Intergovernmental fiscal transfers in Asia: Current practice and challenges for the future, 20–49 Asian Development Bank.

Shah, A. (2016). Fiscal policies for coordinated urban-rural development and their relevance for China. Public Finance & Management, 16(1), 51–74.

Smoke, P. (2019). Improving subnational government development finance in emerging and developing economies: Toward a strategic approach. ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 921, Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3358007

Smoke, P. (2017). Looking beyond conventional intergovernmental fiscal frameworks: principles, realities, and neglected issues. In Central and Local Government Relations in Asia. Edward Elgar Publishing. ADBI Working Paper, No. 606, Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo Available from:

https://www.adb.org/publications/looking-beyondconventional-intergovernmental-fiscal-frameworks.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2892924

Soguel, N. (2019). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers and equalization. In Swiss Public Administration (pp. 291–305). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92381-9_17

Sudhipongpracha, T., & Wongpredee, A. (2017). Fiscal decentralization in comparative perspective: analysis

of the intergovernmental grant systems in Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(3), 245–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1138659

Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of political economy, 64(5), 416–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839

Veiga, L. G., & Kurian, M. (2015). Intergovernmental fiscal relations: Questions of accountability and autonomy. In: Kurian M., Ardakanian R. (eds). Governing the Nexus. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05747-7_4

Veiga, L. G., & Veiga, F. J. (2013). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers as pork barrel. Public Choice, 155(3–4), 335–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9863-2

Wagana, D. M., & Iravo, M. A. (2017). Analysis of the relationship between devolved governance, political decentralization, and service delivery: A critical review of the literature.

Wongpredee, A., & Sudhipongpracha, T. (2014). The politics of intergovernmental transfers in Northeast

Thailand. Journal of Developing Societies, 30(3), 343–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X14536974