Biodiversity and predatory potential of coccinellids of rice ecosystems

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • ICAR - Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500030, Telangana ,IN
  • ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Hebbala, Bengaluru - 560024, Karnataka ,IN
  • ICAR - Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500030, Telangana ,IN
  • ICAR - Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500030, Telangana ,IN
  • Mango Research station, Nuzvid - 521201, Dr YSR Horticultural University, Andhra Pradesh ,IN
  • ICAR - Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500030, Telangana, ,IN
  • ICAR-National Research Centre for Banana, Thayanur post, Tiruchirapalli - 620102, Tamil Nadu ,IN
  • ICAR - Indian Institute of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500030, Telangana ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2018/17912

Keywords:

Biodiversity, BPH, coccinellids, predatory potential, rice, WBPH
Entomology

Abstract

Coccinellid species belonging to fifteen genera, under five tribes of the family Coccinellidae were collected and identified in this study. Harmonia (Fab.) was the most predominant in southern regions and Coccinella septumpunctata L. was more abundant in the northern and hill regions. Margalef richness index ranged from 9.07 to 14.00 while the species richness directly measured by Hills number H0 ranged from 5-10, with highest species richness present at Malan, Himachal Pradesh. The highest predation was observed in female H. octomaculata which fed on a maximum of 8.00, 7.42 and 6.59 brown planthopper (BPH), WBPH white backed planthopper (WBPH) and green leafhopper (GLH) respectively per day, while the lowest was observed in Propylea dissecta which fed on 3.18 to 4.50 hoppers per day. Coccinellids like H. octomaculata can be utilized in biological control programmes as a part of Integrated Pest Management to reduce pest outbreaks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2018-07-13

How to Cite

Shanker, C., Sampathkumar, M., Sunil, V., Amudhan, S., Sravanthi, G., Jhansirani, B., Poorani, J., & Katti, G. (2018). Biodiversity and predatory potential of coccinellids of rice ecosystems. Journal of Biological Control, 32(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2018/17912

Issue

Section

Research Articles
Received 2017-08-22
Accepted 2018-04-18
Published 2018-07-13

 

References

Begum MA, Jahan M, Bari MN, Mofazzel Hossain M, Afsana N. 2002. Potentiality of Micraspis discolor (F.) as a biocontrol agent of Nilaparvata lugens (Stal). J Biol Sci. 2: 630–632. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2002.630.632

Chowdhury S, Pritin P, Sontakke T, Boopathi, Bhattacharjee J, Bhattacharjee D, Malsawmzuali. 2015. Taxonomic studies on predatory coccinellid beetles and their species composition in rice ecosystem of Indo-Bangladesh border. The Bioscan 10: 229–242.

Evans EW. 2009. Lady beetles as predators of insects other than Hemiptera. Biol Control 51: 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.011

Garg A, Sethi G. 1983. First record by predatory beetle, Brumoides suturalis (F.) feeding on rice pests. Bull Entomol. 24: 138-140

Hodek I, Van Emden HF, Honek A. 2012. Ecology and behaviour of the ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118223208 PMCid:PMC3863175

Honek A, Dixon AFG, Soares AO, Skuhrovec J, Martinkova Z. 2017. Spatial and temporal changes in the abundance and composition of ladybird (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Communities. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 20: 61–67. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2017.04.001 PMid:28602237

Honek A, Martinkova Z, Dixon AFG, Roy HE, Pekar S. 2016. Long-term changes in communities of native coccinellids: Population fluctuations and the effect of competition from an invasive non-native species. Insect Conserv Divers. 9: 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/ icad.12158

Islam MZ, Labani SA, Khan AB. 2016. Feeding propensity and cannibalism of Micraspis discolor (Fab.) to different prey species (Aphis craccivora and Nilaparvata lugens) under laboratory. J Environ Sci Nat Resour. 9: 81-85.

Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF. 1988. Statistical ecology - A primer on methods and computing. A wiley Interscience publication.

Lydia Ch, Sampathkumar M, Mohan M, Gururaj Katti, Chitra Shanker. 2012. Weeds as reservoir of alternate prey for coccinellids of rice, In: Gururaj Katti. In: Anitha K, Somasekhar N, Laha GS, Sarath Babu B and Varaprasad KS. (Eds.). International Conference on Plant Health Management for Food Security, DRR, Hyderabad, India. pp. 135-136.

McAleece N, Gage JDG, Lambshead PJD, Paterson GLJ. 1997. Biodiversity professional statistics analysis software, Available from: http://www.sams.ac.uk/peterlamont/ biodiversity-pro#sthash.2h7iayrD.dpuf

Parasuraman S. 1989. Predatory coccinellids in rice fields at agricultural college and research institute, Madurai. IRRN. 14: 30.

Rattanapun W. 2012. Biology and potentiality in biological control of Micraspis discolor (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 77(4): 541-8. PMid:23885421

Samal P, Misra BC. 1985. Morphology and biology of the coccinellid beetle Verania discolor Fab. (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera), a predator on rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal). Oryza 22: 58-60.

Samal P, Misra BC. 1982. Coccinella repanda (Thumb). A predatory Coccinellid beetle of rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) from CRRI, Cuttack. Oryza 19: 212.

Shanker C. Mohan M, Sampathkumar M, Lydia Ch, Katti G. 2013. Functional significance of Micraspis discolor (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera) in rice ecosystem. J Appl Entomol. 137: 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jen.12035

Snyder WE. 2009. Coccinellids in diverse communities: Which niche fits? Biol Control 51: 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.010

Vinothkumar B. 2013. Diversity of coccinellid predators in upland rainfed rice ecosystem. J Biol Control 27: 184– 189.

Weber DC, Lundgren JG. 2009. Assessing the trophic ecology of the Coccinellidae: their roles as predators, and as prey. Biol Control 51: 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.05.013

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>